MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years

NCT02069444 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2014-02-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.

Conditions

  • All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Macintosh laryngoscope

intubation criterias withMacintosh laryngoscopein pediatric patients

PROCEDURE

Truview EVO2 laryngoscope

intubation criterias with Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in pediatric patients

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ankara University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-01-31
Primary Completion
2012-10-31

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02069444 on ClinicalTrials.gov