MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy, Truview EVO2 and Glidescope in Pediatric Patients

NCT01023568 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 134

Last updated 2017-02-02

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two novel videolaryngoscope systems, the Glidescope and the Truview PCD against standard direct laryngoscopy (DL) in pediatric patients. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the use of videolaryngoscope devices, Glidescope and Truview provide better laryngeal views in pediatric patients as measured by Cormack and ehane (C\&L) (1 to 4, 4 the worst), without increasing the time taken to intubate (TTI), compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL).

The investigators secondary hypotheses are that the use of Glidescope and Truview PCD provoke less hemodynamic response and fewer episodes of de-saturation in pediatric patients.

Conditions

  • Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Macintosh blade

Intubation with Macintosh blade laryngoscope

DEVICE

Glidescope

Intubation with Glidescope laryngoscope.

DEVICE

Truview PCD

Intubation with Truview PCD laryngoscope.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Cleveland Clinic

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Julie Niezgoda, MD · The Cleveland Clinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
10 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-12-31
Primary Completion
2011-05-31
Completion
2011-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01023568 on ClinicalTrials.gov