MedTrace Logo

Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old

NCT01488370 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65

Last updated 2019-03-26

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation will be compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, those intubated with a Storz DCI® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the Storz DCI® video laryngoscope group when compared to the GlideScope® video laryngoscope group and standard laryngoscopy.

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal intubation

Endotracheal intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Loma Linda University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Elizabeth Ghazal, MD · Loma Linda University Department of Anesthesiology

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
23 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-11-30
Primary Completion
2015-07-31
Completion
2015-07-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01488370 on ClinicalTrials.gov