MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the VividTrac® Videolaryngoscope to Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults Under Manual Inline Stabilization

NCT02479672 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2016-10-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in adult patients ages 18 and older who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Adult patients will be randomized to either the VideoTrac® laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy and the time to intubation will be compared and recorded. Patients in both treatment arms will receive manual inline stabilization. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the VividTrac® video laryngoscope group when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

laryngoscopy

Placement of endotracheal tube. If successful intubation does not occur after the first attempt at laryngoscopy, airway equipment used in further attempts will be selected at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.

PROCEDURE

Manual Inline Stabilization

Manual immobilization of Patient's neck with intention to minimize movement from baseline position

DEVICE

VividTrac®

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Loma Linda University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-31
Completion
2016-07-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02479672 on ClinicalTrials.gov