Comparative Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction With and Without Piezocision
NCT07752212 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2026-08-11
Summary
Intraoral impressions with alginate will be taken at the start of treatment and plaster casts will be obtained by using ortho plaster. Separators will be passed mesial and distal to first molars to create space for band placement. After 7-10 days bands will be cemented on first molars. Pre- adjusted edgewise brackets with 0.022 in-slot Roth appliance will be bonded on teeth according to the treatment plan. Extractions will be done according to the treatment plan and piezocision will be carried out after levelling and alignment.
This will be a split mouth study with one side receiving piezocision (experimental) and the other side acting as control, after random allocation. Randomization will be done by simple randomization method in which experimental side will be randomly allocated to the patient and opposite side of the same patient will act as control. First patient will have piezocision on right side and 2nd patient will have piezocision on left side, 3rd patient will have piezocision on right side and 4th patient will have piezocision on left side and so on.
After extraction of maxillary first premolars, piezocision will be performed on experimental side whereas the opposite side will be taken as control. Piezocision will be performed under local anesthesia by giving two vertical interproximal incisions on mesiobuccal \& distobuccal line angles of canine on experimental side 2mm below the interdental papilla with piezo electrical knife without flap reflection. Piezoelectric incisions of the cortical alveolar bone will then be made with piezotome. The incisions will be sutured with non resorbable 4-0 black silk with the interrupted suture technique. After piezocision canine retraction will be carried out by either continuous mechanics, sectional mechanics or sliding mechanics depending on the treatment plan. Mechanics will be same on left and right side of the patient and mean retraction will be measured at four time intervals. T0 at the start of canine retraction, T1 at 4 weeks, T2 at 8 weeks and T3 at 12 weeks after piezocision
Conditions
- Canine Retraction
- Piezocision
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Piezocision
After extraction of maxillary first premolars, piezocision will be performed on experimental side whereas the opposite side will be taken as control. Piezocision will be performed under local anesthesia by giving two vertical interproximal incisions on mesiobuccal \& distobuccal line angles
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional canine retraction
Conventional canine retraction will be carried out by NiTi coil spring with 150g force
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Foundation University Islamabad
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-01
- Completion
- 2024-07-01
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Effects of Osteoperforation and Piezocorticision on Canine Retraction
NCT03308851 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Rate and Amount of Orthodontic Space Closure
NCT07445321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-centered Outcomes During Using Self-ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision vs Traditional Brackets
NCT05416242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Force Mechanics Using Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT07508384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Changes Following the Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT07294378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines
NCT03535285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Brackets Bonded With Bulk Fill Composite and Conventional Composite in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07155343 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
NCT07063186 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Biological Technique in Upper Canine Retraction and Levels of Discomfort
NCT03399422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Accelerated Traction of Impacted Canines in Terms of Speed and Changes in the Dental Arches
NCT05891665 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Adhesive PreCoated (APC) Flash-free and Conventional Brackets and the Effects on Enamel Demineralization and Periodontal Health
NCT07752290 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Cleft Development at Two Time Points of Canine Retraction
NCT07210762 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Periodontal Distractor in Acceleration of Canine Retraction
NCT05872048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Effects of Piezocision vs Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT04743700 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Alignment Efficiency, Arch Dimensional Changes, and Passive Extraction Space Closure Between Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets
NCT07503314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Adhesive Systems on White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07753512 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
NCT04905004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: a Split Mouth Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT06634017 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Poul Gjessing Versus T Loops for Orthodontic Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT05727124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of One-Step and Two-Step Light Curing of Bonding Agents and Composite in Orthodontics
NCT07491796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"
NCT07307209 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA