Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
NCT07063186 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2025-07-16
Summary
The goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is to determine the most effective way to tie the main wire to the regular orthodontic brackets during the stage of orthodontic treatment where the canines are retracted. This study is for orthodontic patients aged 16 years and older who need to have their canines retracted into spaces where other teeth have been removed.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. What is the effect of different ways of tying the wire to the braces on how much the maxillary canine moves back using conventional brackets?
2. How do various ways of tying the wire influence unwanted movements of the maxillary canines-specifically rotation, tipping, and extrusion?
3. What is the effect of these different tying methods on how much the back molar teeth shift forward (this is called "anchorage loss") while the maxillary canine is being pulled back?
Researchers will compare three different ways of tying the wire to the braces to see if they differ in the amount of maxillary canine retraction, three-dimensional positional changes (rotation, tipping, and extrusion), and anchorage loss of maxillary first molars:
* Group A: Uses an elastic power chain that wraps around all four parts (wings) of the brace.
* Group B: Uses thin stainless-steel wires (ligatures) to tie the brace first, then an elastic power chain is placed over these wires, also wrapping around all four parts of the brace.
* Group C: Uses small elastic rings on the two front parts (mesial wings) of the brace, and an elastic power chain on the two back parts (distal wings) of the brace.
Participants will consist of orthodontic patients aged 16 years and above from the Postgraduate Orthodontic Clinic, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM, Kuantan, who require extraction of one or both maxillary first premolars, are planned for maximum anchorage using a Nance appliance, need at least 4mm of maxillary canine retraction, and have good oral hygiene.
Participants will:
* Undergo screening and provide written informed consent for participation.
* Receive a comprehensive orthodontic examination, including photographic records, impressions, and radiographs.
* Have molar bands fitted and a Nance button fabricated and cemented, followed by dental extractions of maxillary first premolars.
* Undergo bond-up with conventional stainless-steel brackets and initial archwire placement.
* Progress through an alignment and levelling phase using progressively larger archwires, culminating in a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire.
* At baseline (T0) and subsequent 4-week follow-up intervals (T1, T2, T3), have intraoral three-dimensional scans taken after archwire removal.
* Receive canine retraction using elastomeric power chains delivering a standardized 150g force. This is done as a two-step retraction, where the canine is retracted in isolation.
* Continue to receive full orthodontic treatment to completion even after the data collection period ends at T3.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Canine Retraction
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Group A - Elastomeric power chain on all bracket wings.
Elastomeric power chain is engaged on all bracket wings
- OTHER
-
Group B - Stainless steel ligatures with elastomeric power chain placed over all bracket wings.
Stainless steel ligatures are used to tie in the archwire on all bracket wings, with an elastomeric power chain placed over the ligatures
- OTHER
-
Group C - Elastomeric modules on mesial wings and power chain on distal wings.
Elastomeric modules are placed on the mesial wings of each bracket, while an elastomeric power chain is engaged on the distal wings
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
International Islamic University Malaysia
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Asst. Prof. Dr. Kumeran S/O Mohan · International Islamic University Malaysia
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- Malaysia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness of Elastic Chains Versus Elastics in Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT07141836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines
NCT03535285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Self-ligating Brackets System Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations
NCT05595174 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laceback
NCT07039071 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Canine Retraction Using Ni-ti Closed-coil Springs Vs Elastomeric Power Chains During Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06567730 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Arch Expansion Changes Between Passive Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets
NCT03363620 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT06244810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effect of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin on Tooth Movement
NCT06562452 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Changes Following the Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT07294378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on the Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Recession Coverage
NCT03886051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Quantity of Distal Movement of the Upper Canine and Molar
NCT01654419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alignment Efficiency and Coating Durability of Aesthetic Archwires
NCT03876184 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
NCT04905004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT03678805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Alignment Efficiency of Steel Vs Elastomeric Ligatures In Lower Anterior Teeth
NCT07014332 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Self-ligating Brackets Plus Minor Surgery in Treating Crowded Cases of Malocclusion
NCT03647241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Clinical Trial: Conventional Ligation vs Figure of 8
NCT01771692 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Root Resorption and Alveolar Bone in the Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin: A Split-Mouth Trial
NCT06634888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing a Novel Closed Exposure Technique to a Conventional Method for Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT06833034 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative CT Evaluation of the Amount of Root Resorption in Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT03613285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Class III Elastics on Stability of Orthopaedic Class III Correction
NCT04911400 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA