MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.

NCT04333836 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2020-04-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Clear aligners and Conventional braces for upper canine retraction (space closure) regarding canine tipping , anchorage loss and treatment time.

Conditions

  • Removable Aligners, Conventional Brackets

Interventions

DEVICE

Removable Clear Aligners

1. Plaster dental models will be poured from the rubber base impression. 2. Digital dental models will be created through scanning of plaster dental models. 3. Planning of the aligners will be done on 3 shape clear aligner studio®. 4. Aligners will be fabricated on 3d printed models using vacuum formers. 5. Anchorage reinforcement for posterior segments by using buccal miniscrews. 6. Patient will receive the first aligner and will be instructed to wear it full time (except during eating and brushing) for 2 weeks. 7. Patient will receive the following aligner after 2 weeks. 8. Follow up visits every 2 weeks until complete canine retraction.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-07-31
Primary Completion
2021-08-31
Completion
2022-01-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04333836 on ClinicalTrials.gov