Evaluation of the Accelerated Traction of Impacted Canines in Terms of Speed and Changes in the Dental Arches
NCT05891665 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46
Last updated 2023-06-07
Summary
The time required for orthodontic traction of impacted canines after surgical exposure is a particularly troubling clinical problem because it prolongs the orthodontic treatment duration. During traction process, several complications could result in alveolar bone loss, root resorption of the adjacent teeth, ankylosis, discoloration, loss or vitality and gingival recession. Accordingly, and due to the lack of studies concerned with accelerating the traction movement of the impacted canines, we conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of some surgical interventions (corticotomy and Piezocision) in increasing the rate of orthodontic traction movement. We also aimed to evaluate dentoalveolar changes associated with the use of such accelerating procedures compared with the conventional traction method.
Conditions
- Impacted Tooth With Abnormal Positioning
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Corticotomy
A corticotomy procedure will be applied with some osteoperforations during the surgical exposure of the impacted canine. Then this will be followed after 8 weeks with another surgical stimulation using piezosurgery.
- PROCEDURE
-
Traditional traction of the impacted canine without corticotomy
In this group of patients, the traction of the impacted canine will be performed traditionally without the involvement of additional surgical intervention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Damascus University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mahran R. Mousa, DDS MSc · PhD student at the Department of Orthodontics
-
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD · Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
-
Omar Heshmeh, DDS MSc PhD · Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 28 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-01-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-01
- Completion
- 2023-03-12
Countries
- Syria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Root Resorption and Dehiscence Formation Between Two Methods of Leveling and Alignment of Lower Teeth
NCT04601662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Leveling and Alignment Using Corticision
NCT03310086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction With and Without Power Arm
NCT06352996 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction
NCT05265416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment
NCT02606331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Patient Experience With a Surgically-assisted Acceleration Method of Orthodontic Treatment
NCT05250921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Sliding Mechanisms on Round-section Arch Wire
NCT07243509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines
NCT03535285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Periodontal Parameters in Self-ligating Brackets Alone or With Corticotomy vs Conventional Brackets
NCT04950829 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-related Outcomes When Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06875037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Self-ligating Brackets Plus Minor Surgery in Treating Crowded Cases of Malocclusion
NCT03647241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-centered Outcomes During Using Self-ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision vs Traditional Brackets
NCT05416242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of a Modified Dentoalveolar Distractor to Retract Maxillary Canines
NCT02332421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Dimensional Bony Changes Following Laser Corticotomy
NCT06702956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
NCT04905004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Acceleration of Alignment of Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth
NCT03659097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Canine Retraction Using Different Bracket Slots' Sizes
NCT05361863 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser-assisted Flapless Corticotomy in Accelerating Canine Retraction
NCT04316403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction
NCT04383600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Corticotomy in En-mass Retraction
NCT03180151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Alveolar-decortication on Velocity of Tooth Movement
NCT01093352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED