Comparison of One-Step and Two-Step Light Curing of Bonding Agents and Composite in Orthodontics
NCT07491796 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64
Last updated 2026-03-24
Summary
Effectiveness of One-Step Versus Two-Step Light Curing of Bonding Agent and Composite in Orthodontic Bracket Bonding:
Study Design: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Study Type: Interventional Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Intervention Model Description: Participants undergoing orthodontic treatment will be randomly assigned to two groups. One group will receive one-step (1-step) light curing of the bonding agent and composite simultaneously, and the other group will receive two-step (2-step) curing, in which the bonding agent is cured first, followed by curing of the composite.
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor) Masking Description: The evaluator assessing outcomes, including bond failure or adhesive remnant index (ARI), will be blinded to the intervention group to minimise assessment bias.
Primary Purpose: Treatment Arms and Interventions: Experimental Group Two-Step Light Curing Description: During orthodontic bracket bonding, the bonding agent and composite will be cured simultaneously using a light-curing unit according to the manufacturer's recommended curing time.
Intervention Type: Procedure Intervention Name: One-Step Light Curing Technique Active Comparator Group: Two-Step Light Curing Description: During orthodontic bracket bonding, the bonding agent will be cured first, followed by curing of the composite separately using a light-curing unit according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Outcome Measures Primary Outcome Measure: Bond Failure Rate of Orthodontic Brackets Description: The number of bracket failures observed during the study period will be recorded to assess the effectiveness of the curing technique.
Time Frame: During the follow-up period of 6 months after bonding Secondary Outcome Measures: Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) Score Description: ARI scores will be evaluated after bracket debonding to determine the amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth surface and to assess bonding characteristics.
Time Frame: At the time of bracket debonding. Inclusion Criteria: Patients requiring fixed orthodontic treatment with Permanent dentition present, willing to participate and provide informed consent, and good oral hygiene Exclusion Criteria: Patients with enamel defects or dental fluorosis, Systemic diseases affecting oral health, and Patients with poor oral hygiene
Brief Summary This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of one-step versus two-step light-curing techniques used during orthodontic bracket bonding. Adequate polymerization of the bonding agent and composite is essential to achieve optimal bond strength and reduce bracket failure. Participants requiring fixed orthodontic treatment will be randomly allocated into two groups. One group will receive simultaneous curing of the bonding agent and composite (one-step curing), and the other group will receive sequential curing of the bonding agent followed by the composite (two-step curing). The outcomes will be assessed by evaluating bond effectiveness and related clinical parameters. Successful orthodontic treatment depends greatly on the strength and durability of bracket bonding. Proper polymerization of bonding agents and composite resins is critical to ensure adequate adhesion between the bracket and tooth surface. Different light-curing techniques are used in clinical practice, including one-step curing in which both the bonding agent and composite are cured simultaneously, and two-step curing, where the bonding agent is cured first, followed by the composite.
Although both techniques are commonly used, there is limited clinical evidence comparing their effectiveness during orthodontic bracket bonding. Inadequate curing may compromise bond strength and increase bracket failure rates, leading to prolonged treatment time and additional clinical procedures.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one-step and two-step light-curing techniques during orthodontic bracket bonding. Participants undergoing orthodontic treatment will be randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups. Standardized bonding procedures will be followed to ensure consistency.
The outcomes of the study will help determine whether curing both materials simultaneously or sequentially results in better clinical performance. The findings may contribute to improving bonding protocols and enhancing the efficiency and reliability of orthodontic treatment.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Treatment
- Bracket Failure
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
One step light curing of bonding agent and composite
it is a control group which follows regular step done by orthodontists in routine bases
- PROCEDURE
-
Two step light curing of bonding agent and composite
it is an experimental group where bonding agent is cured before application of composite. an additional step is added to the procedure which is normally not followed by orthodontists
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Natasha Khalily, Bachelor of Dental Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Months
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-05-04
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-15
- Completion
- 2025-09-12
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite
NCT05660668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RMGI v Composite for Orthodontic Bonding
NCT01925924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Rate and Amount of Orthodontic Space Closure
NCT07445321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a "Flash-free" Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
NCT02030002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial and Periodontal Changes Associated With Conventional Versus Self Ligating Brackets
NCT02436525 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes Using the Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence Method
NCT03738839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer-aided Indirect Bonding Versus Traditional Direct Bonding of Brackets in Orthodontic Patients
NCT04395625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Approaches to Correct Deep Bite in Mixed Dentition Patients
NCT03641196 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Remineralizing Self-Etch Primer for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
NCT07291830 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Micro-abrasive Blasting vs Acid Etching of Orthodontic Bracket Bases
NCT04456114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of White Spot Lesion Development Using 3 Orthodontic Adhesive Systems
NCT05738356 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bracket Failure With a Novel Etchant Paste. A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05766033 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Smile Arc Assessment in Orthodontic Patients Following Smile Arc Protection VS MBT Placement Guide Bonding Strategies
NCT05277506 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bracket Bonding Variables Using 3D Printed Bonding Guide Versus Digital Indirect Bonding
NCT05193708 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Using Water Flosser Versus Interdental Brush on Gingival Health in Patients With Mandibular Bonded Retainer
NCT07054203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Teeth Decrowding With and Without Fixed Appliances
NCT06416189 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Orthodontic Aligning Archwire Materials
NCT04090931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Digital 3D Printed Transfer Tray Versus Thermoformed Transfer Tray for Indirect Bonding
NCT03363607 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets
NCT05764187 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA