Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Renal Stones Using a Sheathless Approach or Using a Flexible and Navigable Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)
NCT07741084 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 225
Last updated 2026-08-03
Summary
The primary aim of the study is to compare stone free rates following ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) using a sheathless approach (low power laser settings) or using a flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath (FANS) with either low power or high power laser settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of sheathless- and FANS assisted URS lithotripsy in terms of operative time, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Following the primary comparison between sheathless and FANS groups, another aim is to compare the outcome of low power and high power URS lithotripsy in the FANS patients with respect to operative time, SFR, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for URS lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Akershus University Hospital and The Hospital of Vestfold - all renal stone centres in Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using one of three alternative ureteroscopic approaches: Group 1: Sheathless URS using low power TFL 4 -10 Watts, short pulse mode, Group 2: URS with FANS using low power TFL 4 - 10 Watts, short pulse mode or Group 3: URS with FANS using high power TFL 16 - 24 Watts, short pulse mode. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the three randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
Conditions
- Renal Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Sheathless URS
Sheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/10Hz (4W)
- PROCEDURE
-
FANS, low power
Sheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.6J/10Hz (6W)
- PROCEDURE
-
FANS, high power
URS with FANS using high laser power (16-24W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 40Hz, 0.6J at 30 - 40Hz, or 0.8J at 20 - 30Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/40Hz (16W)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Akershus
collaborator OTHER -
The Hospital of Vestfold
collaborator OTHER -
Haukeland University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Øyvind Ulvik · Haukeland University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-15
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-31
- Completion
- 2027-06-30
Countries
- Norway
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laser Lithotripsy During URS - Holmium vs Thulium
NCT04668586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-FURS vs Suction Mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT07295860 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries
NCT07076589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) vs Conventional Access Sheaths in RIRS: A Prospective Randomized Study.
NCT07377461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS vs CVAC for Medium to Large Stones
NCT07514351 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial
NCT06898216 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT06122129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Narrow Focus (F1) Versus Wide Focus (F3) of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Renal Calculi
NCT04759599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Temperature Profiles During Laser Activation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT05677425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Failed Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy
NCT05911945 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04643145 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Multi-center Study Comparing Pulsed Tm:YAG Laser to Pulse Modulated Holmium Laser in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis With FANS Access Sheaths
NCT07516106 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Ureteroscopy and Its Effect on Stone Free Rate
NCT00199524 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stone Clearance With Aspiration vs Other Technologies: a Real-world Evidence Study
NCT07155005 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING