High Versus Low Power Settings During Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy
NCT05697250 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2025-03-05
Summary
The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings.
Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic.
Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
Conditions
- Renal Stone
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Laser power settings (Thulium Fiber Laser)
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using low power laser settings (0.4 - 0.6 J at 10 Hz corresponding to 2.4 - 6.0 Watts) or high power laser settings (0.4 J at 40 Hz, 0.6 J at 30 Hz or 0.8 J at 20 Hz corresponding to 16 - 18 Watts).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Haukeland University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Øyvind Ulvik, Assoc Prof · Haukeland University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-01-23
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-30
- Completion
- 2025-09-30
Countries
- Norway
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Laser Modality on Total Lasing Time and Total Energy in Patients With Large, Dense Renal Calculi
NCT05869890 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Comparison Between Different Laser Settings for Ureteral \ Kidney Stones Treatment During Ureteroscopy
NCT02279927 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) Versus Holmium MOSES Laser for Ureteroscopic Management of Kidney Stones
NCT05598645 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Super Pulse Fiber Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
NCT06667557 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Thulio Pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG)
NCT06721975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis
NCT04997668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Utilizing Holmium Laser for FURS Renal Stone Lithotripsy Comparing Stone Breaking vs. Stone Dusting Settings
NCT02683993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stone Clearance in Patients With Upper Ureteric Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Compared With Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined With Tamsulosin Therapy
NCT05725122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Prospective Trial
NCT05814133 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Super-Pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:YAG Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones
NCT07012941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Reverse Trendelenburg Position for Upper Ureteral Stones
NCT04894058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteric Stenting Versus Non-stenting Following Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT04145063 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Powered Stone Dusting vs. Fragmentation and Basketing at Time of Ureteroscopy
NCT05006937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones
NCT03526458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease
NCT06306222 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Pulse Versus Short Pulse Laser Dusting for Renal Stones
NCT03608098 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Duration Between Drainage and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT06101563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA