The Effect of Full Versus Partial Coverage Thermoformed Retainers in Dual Retention With a Lower Bonded Retainer, on Periodontal, Orthodontic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
NCT07669129 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42
Last updated 2026-07-23
Summary
After braces are removed, teeth may move back toward their original positions. Retainers are used to help keep teeth straight after orthodontic treatment. This study compares two types of clear removable retainers used together with a fixed wire retainer behind the lower front teeth. One retainer covers the entire inner surface of the teeth (full coverage), while the other covers only part of the inner surface (partial coverage).
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the two retainer designs differ in their effects on gum health, comfort, retainer breakages, stability of the orthodontic correction, comfort, and compliance. The findings from this study may help orthodontists choose the most suitable retainer design for future patients.
Participants in this study will receive a fixed wire retainer on the lower front teeth and upper and lower clear removable retainers. They will be randomly assigned to receive either the full coverage or partial coverage lower retainer. Participants will attend follow-up visits at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after starting retainer wear. At these visits, the orthodontist will examine the teeth, gums, and retainers, and participants will complete a short questionnaire about their experience wearing the retainer.
This study excluded participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding within the first 6 months, have uncontrolled medical conditions or gum disease, smoke or vape, require a Hawley retainer instead of a clear retainer, or have missing front teeth or certain jaw conditions.
Participants may benefit from receiving retainers, oral hygiene care, and regular monitoring of their teeth and gum health at no additional cost. Participants will also receive an oral care kit during the debond appointment and at the 3-month and 6-month review visits.
Possible risks include breakage of the retainers, which may require repair or replacement, gum problems if oral hygiene is not maintained, and slight tooth movement despite retainer use. If gum problems develop, appropriate cleaning and referral for further treatment may be provided. Replacement retainers required during the study period will be provided free of charge.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Retention
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Partial coverage vivera retainer
A removable lower retainer (Vivera retainer) with partial coverage design which covers part of the inside surface of lower teeth excluding the fixed bonded retainer
- DEVICE
-
Full coverage Vivera retainer
A removable lower retainer (Vivera retainer) with full coverage design which covers the entire inside surface of lower teeth including the fixed bonded retainer
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Malaya
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-30
Countries
- Malaysia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Stability of Bimaxillary Proclination Cases Following Fixed Appliances Treatment: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT04578704 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability
NCT06284499 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Colonisation On Vacuum-Formed Retainers Constructed On Conventional Models And Three Dimensional (3D) Reconstructed Models
NCT03844425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Stability During Retention Phase.
NCT05723094 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers
NCT05644119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of Two Types of Multistranded Fixed Retainers
NCT07476950 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Approaches to Correct Deep Bite in Mixed Dentition Patients
NCT03641196 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT05926934 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
: "Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 3 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05879588 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Remote Monitoring for Orthodontic Retention Review
NCT05006339 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
NCT07063186 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
NCT06944860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Orthodontic Retention Protocols
NCT05121220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT06244810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Versus Band-and-Loop Space Maintainers in Children: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
NCT07730944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA