Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Versus Band-and-Loop Space Maintainers in Children: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
NCT07730944 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2026-07-28
Summary
This split-mouth randomized clinical study aims to compare the clinical performance of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin (GFRCR) space maintainers with conventional band-and-loop (B\&L) space maintainers following premature loss of primary molars in children. Twenty children aged 5-8 years with bilateral premature loss of comparable primary molars will receive a GFRCR appliance on one side of the dental arch and a conventional B\&L appliance on the contralateral side. Participants will be evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 months for appliance retention, gingival health, dental caries around the abutment teeth, and preservation of the extraction space. The study aims to determine whether GFRCR space maintainers provide clinical performance comparable to conventional B\&L appliances while offering the advantages of improved esthetics and single-visit placement.
Conditions
- Premature Loss of Primary Teeth
- Space Maintenance
- Malocclusion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin (GFRCR) Space Maintainer
A directly bonded fixed space maintainer fabricated using Splint-it® glass fiber-reinforced composite resin. The appliance was placed in a single clinical visit to preserve the extraction space following premature loss of a primary molar.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Band-and-Loop Space Maintainer
A conventionally fabricated stainless-steel band-and-loop fixed space maintainer cemented onto the abutment tooth to preserve the extraction space following premature loss of a primary molar.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ali Assiry
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 5 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-25
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-20
- Completion
- 2026-07-20
Countries
- Saudi Arabia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effectiveness of Combined Design Nance/Transpalatal Arch Appliance in Maintaining Arch Dimensions After Premature Extraction of Primary Molars
NCT05514145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short Term Efficiency of Presurgical Vacuum Formed Nasoalveolar Molding Aligners in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Compared With Grayson Acrylic Formed Nasoalveolar Molding Appliances.
NCT04966572 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Multi-looped Lingual Retainer to Relief Anterior Mandibular Crowding
NCT06337435 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Airway Space After Distalization in Adults Using Carrière Motion Appliance
NCT05261217 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative 3D Assessment of Class III Malocclusion Treatments
NCT07179354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Fixed Retainers on the Health of the Gums
NCT01314729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment Outcome of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Four Premolar Extraction Cases
NCT07236775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance
NCT03172442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Magnification Loupes Make the Bracket Bonding Procedure Faster and More Comfortable?
NCT07474389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Type I Collagen Fragments in the GCF and Saliva During OTM
NCT05020431 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Molar Intrusion Using High Pull Headgear
NCT02951286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Stability of Tooth-borne vs Bone-borne Maxillary Expansion: A Parallel Cohort Study
NCT06916299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Full Versus Partial Coverage Thermoformed Retainers in Dual Retention With a Lower Bonded Retainer, on Periodontal, Orthodontic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
NCT07669129 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed vs Conventional Fixed Retainers After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07730476 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser vs Conventional Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial
NCT07517601 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics During Maxillary En-masse Retraction in Adult Patients
NCT03261024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Brackets Bonded With Bulk Fill Composite and Conventional Composite in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07155343 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1