Survival Rate of Two Types of Multistranded Fixed Retainers
NCT07476950 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 133
Last updated 2026-03-17
Summary
1. Why is this study being done? After orthodontic treatment (such as braces), teeth can move back toward their original positions. To prevent this, orthodontists use retainers during the retention phase of treatment. One common option is a fixed retainer, which is a thin wire bonded to the inside surfaces of the front teeth. Fixed retainers help keep teeth in their corrected positions for many years. There are different types of fixed retainers, and they differ in how the wire is made. However, it is still unclear which type works best and lasts the longest. Some retainers may break, come loose, or make oral hygiene more difficult.
This study aims to compare two commonly used types of fixed retainers to determine which one performs better over time.
2. What is the purpose of the study?
The main goal of this study is to find out whether the type of fixed orthodontic retainer affects how long it remains intact and functional after orthodontic treatment. The study will also evaluate whether the type of retainer influences:
\- patient comfort and satisfaction
\- ease of maintaining oral hygiene
* gum and periodontal health
* stability of tooth alignment after treatment.
3. Who can participate?
People may be eligible to participate if they:
\- are 15-50 years old
\- have completed orthodontic treatment
* have all lower front teeth present
* have healthy gums and teeth in the lower front area. Some patients will not be eligible if they have active gum disease or need additional dental treatment in the lower front teeth.
4. What will happen during the study? Participants who agree to take part will be randomly assigned to receive one of two types of fixed retainers. Random assignment means that a computer will decide which retainer each participant receives, similar to drawing lots.
The two types of retainers being compared are:
1. Round twisted wire retainer (3-strand stainless steel wire)
2. Braided rectangular wire retainer (8-strand braided wire) Both types are commonly used in orthodontic practice. 5) What will participants need to do? At the start of the study, the orthodontic appliance (braces) will be removed and the retainer will be bonded to the lower front teeth.
Participants will attend follow-up visits over two years:
* at the start of the study
* after 3, 6,12, 18, and 24 months.
During these visits, the research team will:
\- check whether the retainer is still intact
\- examine gum health
* take dental impressions and photographs
* ask participants to complete a short questionnaire about comfort and oral hygiene.
6\) What are the possible risks?
The study procedures are the same as those commonly used in routine orthodontic care. Possible minor discomforts may include:
\- mild discomfort during gum examination
\- temporary discomfort when dental impressions are taken. No additional invasive procedures are planned. 7) Are there any benefits?
Participants may benefit from:
\- regular monitoring of their retainer
* routine evaluation of gum health
* early detection of any problems with the retainer. The results of this study may help orthodontists choose the most reliable retainer for future patients.
8\) Is participation voluntary? Yes. Taking part in the study is completely voluntary. Participants may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting their orthodontic care. Personal information will be kept confidential and securely stored.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Retention
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Placement of round twisted retainer wire
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive a fixed mandibular lingual retainer made of a three-stranded twisted round stainless steel wire (diameter 0.0215 inches). After completion of active orthodontic treatment and removal of the fixed appliance, the retainer wire will be adapted to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular anterior teeth (canine to canine). The wire will then be bonded to each tooth using a standard orthodontic adhesive technique to provide continuous stabilization of tooth alignment during the retention phase. Prior to retainer placement, professional dental cleaning (scaling and air polishing) will be performed. The retainer will be bonded according to a standardized clinical protocol used in the study site. After placement, the integrity of the retainer will be monitored during scheduled follow-up visits to detect possible failures such as wire fracture or debonding.
- DEVICE
-
Placement of rectangular braided retainer wire
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive a fixed mandibular lingual retainer made of an eight-stranded compressed braided stainless steel wire with a rectangular cross-section (0.008 × 0.03 inches) (Bond-a-Braid Lingual Retainer, HG Orthodontics). After completion of active orthodontic treatment and removal of the fixed orthodontic appliance, the retainer wire will be adapted to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular anterior teeth (canine to canine). The wire will be bonded to each tooth using a standard orthodontic adhesive technique to maintain tooth alignment during the retention phase. Before retainer placement, professional dental cleaning (scaling and air polishing) will be performed. The retainer will be bonded following a standardized clinical protocol applied to all participants in the study. After placement, the integrity and performance of the retainer will be evaluated during scheduled follow-up visits to identify potential failures such as debonding or wir
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Piotr Fudalej
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Piotr FUdalej · Jagiellonian University in Krakow
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-07-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Types of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers: an RCT.
NCT05250765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Two Types of Fixed Lingual Retainers in Preventing Mandibular Incisor Relapse
NCT03881813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
NCT07280455 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up
NCT04105127 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers
NCT05644119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Morphological Changes of Removable Orthodontic Retainers During the Use
NCT06283823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT06244810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quaternary Ammonium Methacryloxy Silicate-containing Acrylic Resin
NCT02525458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention With Three Different Bonded Retainers a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow-up
NCT04828096 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Bonded Versus Vacuum-formed Retainers
NCT04847323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of a Novel Fluoride Varnish in Preventing WSL During/After Treatment With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT03725020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite
NCT05660668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Essix Retainer vs Hawley Retainer
NCT01583933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Three Dimensional Movement Analysis of Maxillary Impacted Canine: a Randomized Clincial Trial
NCT01717417 ·Status: COMPLETED