Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite in Cuspal Coverage Restorations of Vital Posterior Teeth (RCT)
NCT07612462 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-05-28
Summary
This clinical study aims to compare bulk-fill and conventional composite resins in cuspal coverage restorations of posterior teeth. The primary outcomes include evaluating wear resistance, fracture incidence, and recurrent caries at different follow-up periods. Bulk-fill composites are designed for easier placement in thicker increments, potentially improving clinical efficiency. The study seeks to determine whether bulk-fill materials can provide comparable or superior performance to conventional composites in restoring structurally compromised teeth.
Conditions
- Cusp Capping
- Cuspal Coverage
- Tooth Restoration
- Bulk Fill Composite
- Fracture Resistance
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Beautifil Bulk Fill (Shofu Inc.)
This intervention involves performing cuspal coverage restorations in posterior teeth using Shofu Beautifil Bulk Fill composite resin. The composite will be applied in a single increment following the manufacturer's adhesive and placement protocol. Each restoration will be evaluated clinically for wear resistance, fracture incidence, and recurrent caries during the follow-up period.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Future University in Egypt
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Self-Cured Resin Composite in Comparison to Light-Cured Bioactive Resin Composite in Restoring Occlusal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT07480070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Novel Self-cured Resin Composite Compared to a Light-cured Bioactive Resin Composite Restoration in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth
NCT07457749 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06497231 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT05383768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Ceramic-Filled Photopolymer Resin Vs. CAD/CAM Resin Composite Overlays for Restoration of Extensively Damaged Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth. An 18-month Follow-up
NCT07378982 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of an Innovative Self-cure Bulk-Fill Composite Compared to Dual-Cure and Light-Cure Bulk-Fill Composite in Posterior Restorations.
NCT07410468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative in Class I and II Restorations
NCT03764059 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Thermoviscous Bulk Fill Resin Composites in Comparison to Conventional Packable Bulk Fills
NCT05276154 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Full Coverage Hybrid Ceramic Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07264491 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA