Comparison of Trans-Stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Mini-Percutaneous Equipment Versus Trans-stomial Bladder Lithotripsy Using Flexible Fibroscope, Percutaneous Approach and Open Cystolithotomy in Patients With Continent Catheterizable Urinary Reservoir
NCT07643454 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2026-07-01
Summary
The urological management of neurological patients is crucial to ensure patient survival and improve their quality of life. The natural progression of disease in central neurological bladders typically involves a major decrease in both bladder capacity and contractile function, often necessitating cystectomy. One alternative to urinary reconstruction is continent catheterizable urinary diversion (e.g., Miami pouch, Mitrofanoff, Monti, etc.). A common complication of these diversions is the formation of intravesical stones, which require surgical management. When the urethra allows access to the urinary diversion, the gold standard is transurethral lithotripsy using a cystoscope; however, when this is not feasible, several techniques exist, albeit without clear recommendations.
In the literature, the most frequently discussed techniques include bladder dilation, percutaneous bladder lithotripsy using nephrolithotripsy (NLPC) equipment, and trans-stomal lithotripsy using a flexible fibroscope. Although bladder dilation has shown higher complication rates in case series compared to other techniques, there is very little comparative data between the percutaneous and trans-stomal methods in the literature. Case series indicate a higher risk of fistula formation with the percutaneous technique for urinary diversions performed in the gastrointestinal tract as compared to native bladder diversions, and a risk of stenosis or loss of continence with the trans-stomal technique.
At the Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), the Urology Department of the Lyon Sud Hospital has expertise in neuro-urology with a large cohort of patients presenting continent catheterizable urinary diversions, and the Urology Department of Edouard Herriot Hopspital has expertise in NLPC, particularly with the use of mini-NLPC (smaller nephroscope diameter). The synergy between these two departments has enabled the creation of a large cohort, with frequent use of the percutaneous route for bladder lithotripsy and, since 2020, the trans-stomal route using mini-NLPC equipment.
Therefore, given the limited data available in the literature, this retrospective comparative study would provide stronger evidence to improve the management of these patients.
Conditions
- Bladder Calculi
- Continent Catheterizable Urinary Reservoir
- Trans-Stomal Bladder Lithotripsy
- Open Cystolithotomy
Interventions
- OTHER
-
QoL-DUCC questionnaire
Patients of all groups will answer this quality of life questionnaire that has been specially designed for the study
- OTHER
-
Qualiveen Questionnaire
Patients of all groups will answer this validated quality of life questionnaire
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nadia ABID, MD, PhD · Hospices Civils de Lyon
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-01-01
- Completion
- 2027-01-01
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Versus Transurethral Cystolithotripsy in Pediatric Bladder Stones
NCT07614880 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy
NCT00351351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Through-and-through Guidewire on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06837883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Self-posturotherapy on the Elimination of Residual Fragments After Treatment of Lower Calyx Urinary Stones by Extracorporeal Lithotripsy or Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy.
NCT06793540 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Three Ureteral Stenting Strategies After Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi
NCT07616505 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy With High-powered Holmium:Yag Laser Lithotripsy With and Moses On or Moses Off
NCT06346483 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusion Balloon vs. 5FR Ureteral Catheter
NCT06798753 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Usefulness of Flexible Cystoscopy for Preventing Double-J Stent Malposition After Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
NCT03150446 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Different Modalities on Management of Renal Hard Stones
NCT07445646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy
NCT03349099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00873054 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial to Evaluate Post-Operative Outcomes of Ureteral Stent vs Ureteral Stent Free Radical Cystectomy
NCT07234968 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
IAU Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy Study
NCT07622238 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy As Primary Treatment in Renal Stones 2-3 Cm
NCT06892626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA