Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2025-09-09
Summary
The incidence of kidney stones (urolithiasis) has surged in both developing and developed countries, affecting approximately 15% of the global population. From 2010 to 2019, diagnoses of kidney and ureteral stones rose by 8% in Germany, 26% in France, and 15% in England. Correspondingly, the number of surgical stone removal procedures increased by 3%, 38%, and 18%, respectively. Common treatments include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) with lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
URS, depending on stone size, has become a preferred method due to advancements in intraoperative imaging and laser technology. Despite these improvements, small fragments often remain post-intervention, leading to recurrent stones. Complete removal of all fragments is crucial to significantly reduce recurrence rates. Current literature suggests a high recurrence rate with residual fragments, impacting healthcare costs and patient quality of life.
A key objective in endourological research is optimizing the stone clearance rate. Techniques like coagulum lithotomy and the autologous blood clot technique have been developed to enhance residual stone removal after laser fragmentation. These methods benefit selected patients but are not widely adopted due to complications such as reduced intraoperative visibility and long coagulum formation times.
Recently, a two-component hydrogel system called mediNiK® (Purenum GmbH, Germany) was developed. This biocompatible gel can be applied through an endoscope after stone fragmentation and large fragment retrieval to embed smaller fragments and dust, forming a removable conglomerate. MediNiK® has demonstrated effectiveness in embedding and removing stone residues and is already in clinical use in Europe, showing potential for optimizing stone removal.
A multicenter study has assessed the safety and tolerability of mediNiK® in standard URS (Open, randomized, multicentre study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and performance of mediNiK® compared to standard treatment in kidney stone removal - DRKS00030532). Results indicate the gel is safe and tolerable. However, further data from larger cohorts and comparisons with conventional URS are necessary before widespread adoption of mediNiK®.
Conditions
- Nephrolithiasis
- Lithotripsy, Laser
- Ureteroscopy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy
The patient provides written informed consent and is positioned in the supine position. After disinfection, sterile draping, and single-shot antibiotic administration a rigid cystoscopy is performed. Intubation of the ostium with a hydrophilic guidewire and placed into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic control. After a semirigid URS, a working sheath is placed up to the Kidney. A flexible URS with lithotripsy with a Thulium lase is then performed to dust the stones. The fragments are retrieved for analysis. Finally, a double-J or mono-J stent and a transurethral catheter are placed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard of Care Ureterorenoscopy with MediNiK
The patient provides written informed consent and is positioned in the supine position. After disinfection, sterile draping, and single-shot antibiotic administration a rigid cystoscopy is performed. Intubation of the ostium with a hydrophilic guidewire and placed into the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic control. After a semirigid URS, a working sheath is placed up to the Kidney. A flexible URS with lithotripsy with a Thulium lase is then performed to dust the stones. The fragments are retrieved for analysis. Application of MediNiK to embbed the residual stones in the hydrogel and extract it with a basket. Finally, a double-J or mono-J stent and a transurethral catheter are placed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Technical University of Munich
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Michael Straub, Doctor · Technical University of Munich
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-30
- Completion
- 2026-07-30
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Stone
NCT07197385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Reverse Trendelenburg Position for Upper Ureteral Stones
NCT04894058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Ureteroscopy for Stone Treatment, A Global Perspective on Indications and Outcomes
NCT03567421 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Use of the "Comprehensive Complication Index" for Urinary Lithiasis Surgery.
NCT05593783 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscope Caliber and Surgeon Stress
NCT06935500 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney
NCT00739284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06462573 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis
NCT04997668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-Center Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Ureteroscopes
NCT02123082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Control Ureteral Soft Scope System for Treating Stones With Infection.
NCT06841523 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy During URS - Holmium vs Thulium
NCT04668586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA