Clinical Performance of 3D-Printed Resin and Zirconia Implant Restorations
NCT07522671 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-04-13
Summary
This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the clinical performance of 3D-printed resin restorations compared with milled monolithic zirconia in implant-supported single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures (FPDs). A total of patients requiring one or two implant-supported restorations in the mandibular anterior region were randomly allocated to receive either 3D-printed permanent resin restorations (CROWNTEC) or conventionally milled zirconia prostheses.
All restorations were fabricated using a standardized digital workflow and assessed over a 12-month follow-up period. The primary outcome was restoration survival rate, while secondary outcomes included technical complications, peri-implant biological parameters, marginal bone level changes, and patient-reported satisfaction.
This study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding the viability of 3D-printed definitive resin materials as an alternative to zirconia in implant prosthodontics.
Conditions
- Prosthesis User
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
3D-Printed Resin Restoration (CROWNTEC)
Implant-supported single crowns or short-span fixed partial dentures fabricated using 3D-printed permanent resin (CROWNTEC). Restorations are produced using a standardized digital workflow, including intraoral scanning, CAD design, 3D printing at 50 µm layer thickness, post-processing (isopropyl alcohol cleaning, post-curing), finishing, and polishing. Restorations are delivered as screw- or cement-retained prostheses. In addition, Other participants will receive implant-supported single crowns or short-span fixed partial dentures fabricated from monolithic zirconia using CAD-CAM milling. Restorations undergo sintering, finishing, and polishing, and are delive
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Menoufia University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-01
- Completion
- 2028-11-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Adding Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles to Printable Implant Overdenture
NCT06116877 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium
NCT07007572 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques
NCT07208812 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mandibular Posterior Zirconia Crowns With Different Ti-Base Surface Treatments.
NCT07456995 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Descriptive, Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate Full Dentures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing
NCT03997604 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Maxillary Complete Dentures
NCT03613896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Implant Overdentures
NCT04569929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx, Zirconia, and Stainless-Steel Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06450093 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Denture Retention of Intra-orally Scanned Versus Extra-orally Scanned Digitally Printed Maxillary Denture in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT07290322 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.
NCT06637930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study
NCT07035574 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PRINTOW: Occlusal Wear of Denture Teeth in Digitally Fabricated Complete Dentures
NCT07585162 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Single Crowns: 5 Years Study
NCT04355325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Zirconia Abutments on Peri-Implant Tissues in Single-Tooth Restorations
NCT07456163 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of CAD/CAM Onlays Fabricated by Subtractive Versus Additive Digital Manufacturing Techniques.
NCT05943782 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Characteristics and Clinical Performance of Lithium Silicate Versus Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
NCT03530020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Digital 3D Printed Complete Removable Dentures
NCT05845099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Loss in Mandibular Telescopic Overdentures. Overdenture with Milled Titanium, Milled Poly-ether Ketone Ketones and 3D Printed Chrome Cobalt Secondary Copings.
NCT06639893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Proximal Contact Tightness of Zirconia Crowns: Digital Intraoral Scanning vs Conventional Impressions
NCT07142746 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction & Retention of Milled, 3D Printed and Conventional Complete Dentures
NCT03281603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Conventional and 3D-printed Implant-supported Overdentures Retained With New Attachment Systems
NCT07580534 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA