Are There Benefits of Using Energy-based Devices for Opportunistic Salpingo-oophorectomy During Vaginal Hysterectomy Compared to a Standard Cold Approach?
NCT07379411 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2026-01-30
Summary
This study compares two methods for removing the fallopian tubes and ovaries during vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
One method uses an energy-based surgical device called LigaSure Maryland, which seals blood vessels using electrical energy. The other method is the standard surgical approach, which involves clamping, cutting, and suturing the tissue. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the use of the LigaSure device is as safe as, or more effective than, the standard technique, in terms of procedure duration, blood loss, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and complication rates.
Women who are scheduled to undergo vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse and for whom removal of the fallopian tubes and ovaries is recommended may participate in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, receiving either the LigaSure technique or the standard surgical technique.
The decision to perform removal of the fallopian tubes and ovaries will be made before surgery based on standard medical indications. Participants will not be informed which surgical technique is used during their operation. Surgical outcomes between the two groups will be compared to evaluate safety and effectiveness.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
LigaSure MaryLand
Energy-based vessel sealing device used to perform salpingo-oophorectomy.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard salpingo-oophorectomy technique
Salpingo-oophorectomy performed using clamping, cutting, and suturing without the use of energy-based devices.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Wolfson Medical Center
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-16
- Primary Completion
- 2027-09-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-30
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02059954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Ligation
NCT04522232 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Devices of Uterine Manipulation and Vaginal Fornix Delineation at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02197728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Three Different Instruments in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01745315 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Application of Vaginal Manipulator in Abdominal Hysterectomy Operations
NCT05420662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT01364025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
POPQ Associated With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT07137299 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Thermal Injury During TLH
NCT02080546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT03228654 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Analgesic Effects of US Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block for Laparoscopic GY Surgery
NCT02476799 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06398769 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
NCT01802281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
NCT04209036 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Uterine Artery Ligation at Origin in Total Laparscopic Hystrectomy
NCT04808583 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspensions for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT04172896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ESP vs TAP in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT04839445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Partial Bladder Filling on Post-operative Time to Void in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures
NCT02741531 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
NCT01594372 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Tissue Removal During Hysterectomy: The Effect of Vaginal Versus Abdominal Morcellation on Surgical Outcomes
NCT02703246 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Harmonic ACE®+7 Shears in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02278640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
PerClot Compared to Usual Care in Gynaecology Procedures
NCT02835391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
NCT03650998 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Utilization of Uterine Manipulator in Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03943485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Systematic Approach for Cold Knife Morcellation of Large Uterus in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT07330102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA