MedTrace Logo

Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT02059954 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2018-04-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hysterectomy for benign indication is one of the most common surgical procedures in women. Numerous reviews and guidelines recommend the vaginal approach for benign hysterectomy, but the proportion of laparoscopic (and robotic) hysterectomies is increasing.

This study will compare a range of clinical and subjective outcomes of vaginal vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Outcomes include operating time, postoperative recovery, return to work as well as cosmesis, quality of life and sexual health.

Conditions

  • Uterine Fibroids
  • Uterine Leiomyoma
  • Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Hysterectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Austrian Urogynecology Working Group (AUWG)

    collaborator OTHER

  • Medical University of Graz

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Karl F Tamussino, MD · Medical University of Graz

  • Rene W Laky, MD · Medical University of Graz

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2016-08-31
Completion
2017-09-30

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02059954 on ClinicalTrials.gov