Electrosurgery Wars;Ligasure or Enseal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT03433209 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 134

Last updated 2018-02-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The effect of two different bipolar instruments were compared in terms of operative time, total operative time, intra-operative blood loss and intra-operative and postoperative complications. Devices included the LigaSure™ Maryland Jaw 5 mm laparoscopic instrument (LigaSure; LF 1737, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) and ENSEAL™ G2 Articulating Straight 5mm Tissue Sealer (ENSEAL; NSLG2S35A, Ethicon Endo-surgery, US, LLC).

Conditions

  • Task Performance

Interventions

DEVICE

Ligasure device

Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy

DEVICE

Articulating Enseal

Vessel-sealing device used for laparoscopic hysterectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Antalya Training and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-06-01
Primary Completion
2017-11-30
Completion
2018-02-02

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03433209 on ClinicalTrials.gov