Utilization of Uterine Manipulator in Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03943485 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72
Last updated 2019-06-04
Summary
The investigators aimed to investigate whether the uterine manipulator which is usually utilized in laparoscopic hysterectomy would also be of benefit in preventing postoperative vaginal length and sexual function by facilitating the accurate localization fo the colpotomy site. Patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy for benign causes will be randomized into two arms: Group 1 Uterine manipulator arm in which participants received a uterine manipulator during the procedure for aiding to locate the accurate colpotomy site and Group 2 consisting of control patients who will not receive uterine manipulator but undergo a standard abdominal hysterectomy. Postoperative vaginal length, postoperative female sexual function index (FSFI) will be compared with the preoperative measurements in the two groups. A 5 points Surgeon satisfaction scale will also be applied to the surgeons and residents performing the surgery to address their satisfaction in locating the colpotomy site.
Conditions
- Sexual Function Disturbances
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
The uterine manipulator which is primarily used in laparoscopic hysterectomy to accurately locate the colpotomy site. We adopted this device in abdominal hysterectomy.
The uterine manipulator is primarily used in laparoscopic hysterectomy to accurately locate the colpotomy site. We hypothesized that adoption of a uterine manipulator would help the surgeon to better identify the colpotomy site by moving the uterus cranially and thus providing better visualization of the colpotomy site.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Huseyin Kiyak, MD · Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 49 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-05-05
- Primary Completion
- 2019-05-15
- Completion
- 2019-05-20
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Indications
NCT06109753 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Surgical Success After Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT01793584 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Hysterectomy on Quality of Life and Urethral Length
NCT03757975 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Urinary and Sexual Functions After Subtotal Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03087565 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Five-year Survival and Disease-free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Endometrium Cancer Who Underwent Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Uterine Manipulator
NCT06307886 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparing Two Devices of Uterine Manipulation and Vaginal Fornix Delineation at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02197728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimization of Ureterolysis During Hysterectomy
NCT03123315 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06398769 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post-hysterectomy Vaginal Cuff Prolapse Repair
NCT07174921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Two Different Analgesic Techniques on Postoperative Recovery Quality
NCT06766994 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT04125173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic Hysterectomy
NCT04423172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Vaginal Cuff Closure at Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02293369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Versus Vaginal Bisection in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT04904822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02879487 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02059954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
NCT04209036 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Length: Horizontal vs. Vertical Closure
NCT07067645 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Chances for Success of CavatermTM Surgery as a Function of Uterus Probe Length
NCT01436903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
NCT03373513 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Simulator
NCT02234856 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic-robotic Hysterectomy for Uterine Transplantation in Live-donor Patient.
NCT04249791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA