VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06398769 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10
Last updated 2024-05-03
Summary
Hysterectomy, the most commonly performed gynecological operation, can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Minimally invasive procedures such as robotic or laparoscopic approaches are linked to lower perioperative complications and quicker recovery when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Furthermore, recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation plays a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy by facilitating bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also prevents pneumoperitoneum loss by closing off the vaginal space. Despite these apparent benefits, there is no existing report comparing different types of uterine manipulators. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy based on operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and subjective performance.
Conditions
- Operative Time
- Length of Hospital Stay
- Perioperative Complications
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
SecuFix UM
All surgeries were performed using Secufix UM.
- DEVICE
-
VCare UM
All surgeries were performed using VCare UM.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2024-05-31
- Completion
- 2024-05-31
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Efficacy of Using a Novel Full Visual Access Platform System in Transvaginal Hysterectomy
NCT06658145 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Application of Vaginal Manipulator in Abdominal Hysterectomy Operations
NCT05420662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"
NCT07306507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Cuff Closure
NCT03898726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Robotic Platforms for Hysterectomy
NCT06138197 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Radical Hysterectomy: Evolution Of Surgical Approach and Related Outcomes
NCT03577613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Devices of Uterine Manipulation and Vaginal Fornix Delineation at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02197728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Removal of Urinary Catheter After Radical Surgery
NCT03570593 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Vaginal Cuff Closure Sexual Function in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT07228351 ·Status: AVAILABLE
-
Role of Uterine Manipulator in Hysterectomy - Ro.Man.HY
NCT02762214 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH
NCT01217866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of a Uterine Manipulator on the Incidence of Lymphovascular Propagation (LVSI) in Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
NCT05261165 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Cuff Closure in Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT02696239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
NCT03373513 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Manipulator Versus no Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial
NCT05687084 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Chances for Success of CavatermTM Surgery as a Function of Uterus Probe Length
NCT01436903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Length: Horizontal vs. Vertical Closure
NCT07067645 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Self-discontinuation of Urinary Catheters in a Rural Population
NCT07041151 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Implementation of MinimAlly Invasive Hysterectomy Trial
NCT03617354 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
VNOTES and Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
NCT06776718 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for Hysterectomy
NCT04070872 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Robot-assisted(Da Vinci®)Laparoscopic Interventions for Hysterectomy
NCT00683293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA