Lesion Formation With Pulsed Field Versus Cryobaloon Ablation as Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resoncance

NCT06220006 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104

Last updated 2026-04-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomised study will compare pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to ablation lesion quality as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3 months post-ablation. Patients scheduled for first-time AF ablation will be randomised in a 2:1 fashion to receive PVI-only, either by pulsed field ablation (Farapulse Pulsed Field Ablation System, Boston Scientific) or cryoballoon ablation (Medtronic Cryoballoon Ablation System).

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pulmonary vein isolation

Catheter ablation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-11-01
Primary Completion
2025-11-01
Completion
2026-11-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06220006 on ClinicalTrials.gov