Inflammatory Response Following " Pulsed Field Ablation " vs. Radiofrequency Ablation-2

NCT06160076 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 63

Last updated 2025-06-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in an established treatment strategy for AF. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablation modality which has recently been introduced in clinical practice with the aim of improving PVI efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to analyse whether PFA generates a lower inflammatory reaction as compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Radiofrequency

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using radiofrequency energy

DEVICE

Pulsed electric field

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using pulsed electric field

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Bordeaux

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pierre JAÏS, MD · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-16
Primary Completion
2024-10-11
Completion
2025-04-25

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06160076 on ClinicalTrials.gov