Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices in EBUS
NCT06177769 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 183
Last updated 2025-05-11
Summary
Supraglottic airway devices (SAD) provide ventilation of patients requiring respiratory support without tracheal intubation. Therefore, SAD is used to maintain airway during anesthesia in surgeries that do not require intubation. The classical laryngeal mask (cLMA, Intavent Direct, Maidenhead, UK) is an SAD that is available as a more advanced airway method than mask ventilation and a less invasive method than endotracheal intubation. It is used by placing it over the glottis at the level of the larynx and inflating the cuff. The Proseal laryngeal mask (LMA-Proseal™, PLMA, Intavent Orthofix, Maidenhead, UK) is the first supraglottic airway device that is suitable for reuse and includes a gastric drainage channel. I-gel™ (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, UK) is a second-generation laryngeal mask with a soft, gel-like thermoplastic elastomer distal end and no inflatable cuff, designed not to compress the anatomical structures of the larynx and pharynx.
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has become one of the most important invasive diagnostic procedures for pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons. It is a safe and effective technique for sampling hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and masses. It is currently accepted as the first choice for histological sampling of the mediastinum in lung cancer staging.
The use of SAD to secure the airway in patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA has the advantages of being less invasive than endotracheal intubation and providing better surgical field access.
Classical LMA, proseal LMA and I-gel are routinely used airway methods during EBUS-TBNA procedure.
The aim of this study is to compare the routinely used SADs in anesthesia management in patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in terms of intraoperative efficacy and postoperative complications.
Conditions
- Airway Management
- Lung Diseases
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
LMA classic
Airway is secured with LMA clasic
- DEVICE
-
LMA Proseal
Airway is secured with LMA proseal
- DEVICE
-
I-gel
Airway is secured with I-gel
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Derya Güzelkaya, Dr · Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-31
- Completion
- 2024-06-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients
NCT07027293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Supralottic Airway Devicess on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter
NCT05499754 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between the I-gel and the LMA-Unique
NCT02163486 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Gastric Volume in I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airways
NCT07138092 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clasic Laryngeal Mask Airway(C-LMA) and I-gel Releated Regurgitation and Complications
NCT01876836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison in Difficult Airway Scenario Induced in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic™, LMA™ - Flexible and LMA - Proseal™
NCT02979171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Supreme Versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants
NCT03251105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Adult
NCT03544749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed Patients
NCT01909297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT02923427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of CTrach, Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and I-gel for Tracheal Intubation
NCT00983229 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGainTM and I-Gel® Laryngeal Masks in General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02925598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01007370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Laryngeal Mask Airway in Edentulous Geriatric Patients
NCT02197377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel and the Self-pressurized Air-q in Elderly Patients
NCT04365192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Blind Tracheal Intubation Through Supraglottic Airway Devices
NCT05624073 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree With Fiberoptic Bronchoskop Via the I-gel and LMA Protector
NCT03501602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Endotracheal Tube In Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopy Surgery
NCT02127632 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie
NCT02566135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Imaging to Validate I-gel Placement in pediatrıc Patients
NCT04652466 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in Elderly Patients
NCT02026791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Device, Self-pressurized Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA -SP) in Adult Patients: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Airway (c-LMA)
NCT02206438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pressure Support Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Air Way Pressure (CPAP) Using I Gelin Adult Patients,
NCT05116839 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres
NCT02852135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA