A Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Adult
NCT03544749 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104
Last updated 2019-07-18
Summary
The supraglottic airway device(SAD), as an alternative to the endotracheal tube is inserted into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively securing airway. SAD has evolved in recent years to increase efficiency and secure safety. The recently developed Ambu® AuraGain™ is a second-generation SAD with a built-in gastric port and is designed to be fitted well in the larynx and oral cavity after insertion because the shaft is bent at an angle of 90 degrees and has an inflatable cuff.
In a previous study, Ambu® AuraGain™ showed a higher sealing pressure and better fibreoptic finding compared to LMA Supreme in laparoscopic surgery.
On the other hand, I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™, both of the second-generation SAD, show comparatively excellent performance according to the results of previous studies. However, there are no studies comparing the characteristics of two airway devices in adults.
The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™ to make a difficult airway-like situation using cervical collar for adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia.
Conditions
- Laryngeal Mask
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Ambu® AuraGain™
After induction of anesthesia, Ambu® AuraGain™ will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.
- DEVICE
-
I-gel
After induction of anesthesia, I-gel will be inserted for the mechanical ventilation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Seoul National University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tae Kyong Kim, MD, PhD · Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-06-07
- Primary Completion
- 2018-09-27
- Completion
- 2018-10-12
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT02878005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of the Video Laryngeal Mask (SaCoVLM™) in Geriatric Patients: A Comparison With a Conventional Supraglottic Airway Device (Ambu®Auragain™)
NCT06237504 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGainTM and I-Gel® Laryngeal Masks in General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02925598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA
NCT04680169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu Aura-i Laryngeal Mask Versus Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway for Tracheal Intubation in Adults
NCT02226211 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable
NCT02884843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Device, Self-pressurized Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA -SP) in Adult Patients: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Airway (c-LMA)
NCT02206438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu Aura GainTM Guided vs Non Guided in Edentulous Ambu Aura GainTM Without Gastric Tube in Endontolous Patient
NCT03933644 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Oral Intubation Via - Ambu® Aura Gain™ vs Slotted Guedel Tubus
NCT02570269 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Inflation Methods of Ambú Auragain™ and Its Adverse Effects
NCT04795544 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGain and iGel Crossover Comparison
NCT02644837 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask and I-gel to Laryngoscope by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult Airway
NCT02224027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal Mucosa
NCT04062747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the I-gel and Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q sp) in the Elderly Patients
NCT02260427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
NCT03118596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryseal Pro LMA Versus Ambu Aura Gain LMA in Elective Ophthalmological Surgeries
NCT06140667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLED TRAIL COMARING LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION DISPOSABLE AND I-gel IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT
NCT05503277 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices in EBUS
NCT06177769 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Three Supraglottic Airway Devices ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGain
NCT04045899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01007370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in Elderly Patients
NCT02026791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distance From the Glottis to the Grille in Children
NCT03156166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA