Comparison Between the I-gel and the LMA-Unique
NCT02163486 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 103
Last updated 2018-10-19
Summary
Airway management is one of the basic topics in anesthetic practice. Use of endotracheal intubation and face mask are standard methods to maintain an open airway widely adopted for many years. As a result of a search for more appropriate choices from the point of view of effectiveness, reliability and side effects, supraglottic airway devices (SGAD) have been developed.
SGAD's are used for thyroid surgery, ear surgery, carotid endarterectomy, adenotonsillectomy and laser pharyngoplasty, which require a variety of head-neck positions. Changing the head and neck position leads to changes in the shape of the pharynx, which causes variation in the cuff pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure. Oropharyngeal leak pressure values play a determining role in protecting the airway from high cuff pressure. Additionally it shows that the laryngeal mask is correctly placed and is a sign of the effectiveness of positive pressure ventilation. During surgery head-neck and trunk position may change. As a result there is a need for research evaluating the effect of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure during SGAD use.
AIM
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of different head and neck positions on the oropharyngeal leak pressure in LMA-Unique and I-Gel applications. Additionally the placement duration, ease and success of these two supraglottic airway devices will be compared.
Conditions
- Anaesthesia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Group U (UNIQUE)
Before LMA-Unique was inserted, to lubricate the surface in contact with the palate a water-based gel without local anesthetic was applied to completely cover the LMA-Unique cuff.
- DEVICE
-
I-GEL
Before I-gel was inserted, to lubricate the surface in contact with the palate a water-based gel without local anesthetic was applied to completely cover the I-GEL cuff. I-GEL: K-Y Jelly® is a registered trademark of Johnson and Johnson Inc
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dokuz Eylul University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
FARUK ÖZATA, M.D. · STUDY DESİGN
-
BAHAR KUVAKİ, M.D. · Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-02-28
- Completion
- 2011-03-31
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
I-gel vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT02923427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients
NCT07027293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Classical and I-GEL LMAs Selected by Different Methods in Providing a Safe Airway
NCT05430425 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnce™ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®.
NCT03140228 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices in EBUS
NCT06177769 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact on Postoperative Pain of Three Single-use Adult Supraglottic Airway Devices in Short General Anesthetic Under Controlled Ventilation
NCT03614598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA
NCT04680169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGainTM and I-Gel® Laryngeal Masks in General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02925598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal Mucosa
NCT04062747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Type of Laryngeal Mask : I-Gel & LMA ProSeal
NCT00624403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the I-gel and Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q sp) in the Elderly Patients
NCT02260427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of I-Gel Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement Methods in Elective Surgery
NCT03542032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in Infants
NCT01863316 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between the I-gel and Protector Supraglottic Airway Devices
NCT06938308 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Imaging to Validate I-gel Placement in pediatrıc Patients
NCT04652466 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25
NCT01003327 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of LMA-Supreme and I-gel for the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT02745964 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Geriatric Patients and Laryngeal Mask Unique
NCT02219282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Gastric Insufflation With the Classic Igel Laryngeal Mask and the New Igelplus Laryngeal Mask Using Gastric Ultrasound
NCT06578598 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparative Study Between Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and I Gel Airway in Obese Patients Having BMI 35-40 During Elective Non Abdominal Surgery.
NCT03843827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Acceptability of I-GEL® in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Clinical Performance With Classic-LMA™
NCT01320163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices Used for Patients Under General Anesthesia
NCT01001078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in Elderly Patients
NCT02026791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the VBM Intubating Laryngeal Tube and the I-Gel
NCT03067246 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA