The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in Elderly Patients
NCT02026791 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 106
Last updated 2016-11-03
Summary
Since the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was designed and introduced into a clinical setting, a supraglottic airway device is widely used because it has advantages such as manipulation of the device when inserting it is easier than that of an endotracheal tube and it causes less postoperative sore throats. Insertion of an LMA can be performed relatively easily and safety at an appropriate depth of anesthesia when compared with the insertion of an endotracheal tube because an LMA is inserted without using a laryngoscope and without causing stimulus to the vocal cords and the trachea. Hence, an LMA may be useful in cases of coronary artery disease and a carotid endarectomy where stabilization of the cardiopulmonary function is important. In addition, an LMA is hemodynamically stable not only in the induction of anesthesia but also in the arousal of anesthesia and thus less dangerous to a cardiovascular disease patient. LMA may be useful also to patients having chronic obstructive lung disease because the patients have an excessively sensitive airway and ventilation is difficult to perform in them. Therefore, in elderly patients having a prevalence for cardiovascular disease or chronic obstructive lung disease, use of an LMA, which stimulates the airway less, may provide hemodynamical stability and reduce relevant complications or side effects. LMA Supreme which is newly designed in such ways has been proven to be superior to the conventional LMA Classic in terms of easy insertion and oropharyngeal sealing. A study which compared LMA Classic and LMA Supreme with adult subjects showed that LMA Supreme had a superior insertion success rate and better oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) than those of LMA Classic. Another newly developed supraglottic airway device is I-gel. In I-gel, which is a disposable, latex-free LMA, a soft, gel-type cuff made of a thermoplastic elastomer replaces the inflatable cuff of other LMAs. Thus, I-gel has an advantage that, once it is installed, it requires no additional clinical manipulation such as cuff inflation or cuff pressure monitoring. A comparison of I-gel with LMA Classic and other disposable supraglottic airway devices produced by various manufactures in adult subjects showed that the clinical properties were similar with respect to easy insertion, time required for installation, laryngopharynx leak pressure, and degree of glottis exposure observed with a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Thus, I-gel is expected to be a supraglottic airway device which may replace the conventional LMA Classic. The elderly are known to have an upper airway anatomically different from that of younger adults depending on age. A study conducted with CT showed that normal elderly people had a wider upper airway than that of younger males or middle-aged males and that elderly with accompanying sleep apnea had a wider upper airway than that of younger males in all regions including the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx. Therefore, because the upper airway of the elderly is wider and longer, a different supraglottic airway device guide may be necessary. Our previous studies showed that the single time success rate was significantly lower, the insertion was more difficult, and the insertion took a longer time when the LMA classic was used in elderly patients than in younger adult patients. However, there is no available guide for the use of a supraglottic airway device or for a supraglottic airway device more appropriate for elderly patients. Moreover, no study has been ever conducted with regard to such a guide.
Therefore, in this study, the clinical usefulness of I-gel and LMA Supreme, which are the newest supraglottic airway devices, was verified in elderly patients. It was also verified which of the two devices is better to use as a supraglottic airway device.
Conditions
- The Elderly Patients Aged Between 65 and 85
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
I-gel
* The patient was monitored at 1-5 minute intervals. * While supplying oxygen through a mask, propofol 1.0mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5ug/kg were intravenously injected to induce anesthesia. When consciousness was not lost, propofol 0.5mg/kg was additionally injected. After consciousness was lost and spontaneous respiration disappeared, rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg was intravenously injected while performing manual ventilation. * After injecting an anesthetic and muscle relaxant, the injection concentration of fresh gas including 6 L/min oxygen and desflurane was regulated to maintain BIS between 40 and 60. A train of four (TOF) was performed with a nerve stimulator for muscle relaxation monitoring to verify that a muscular contraction did not take place (TOF=0). * Then, with the assistance of another anesthesiologist, I-gel prepared in advance was inserted.
- DEVICE
-
Supreme-LMA
* The patient was monitored at 1-5 minute intervals. * While supplying oxygen through a mask, propofol 1.0mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5ug/kg were intravenously injected to induce anesthesia. When consciousness was not lost, propofol 0.5mg/kg was additionally injected. After consciousness was lost and spontaneous respiration disappeared, rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg was intravenously injected while performing manual ventilation. * After injecting an anesthetic and muscle relaxant, the injection concentration of fresh gas including 6 L/min oxygen and desflurane was regulated to maintain BIS between 40 and 60. A train of four (TOF) was performed with a nerve stimulator for muscle relaxation monitoring to verify that a muscular contraction did not take place (TOF=0). * Then, with the assistance of another anesthesiologist, Supreme LMA prepared in advance was inserted.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 65 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-10-31
- Completion
- 2016-10-31
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Device, I-gel™, in Neonates and Infants: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Mask Airway (c-LMA)
NCT01437137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask and I-gel to Laryngoscope by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult Airway
NCT02224027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Mask Supreme™ Versus the I-gel™
NCT00653237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the I-gel and Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q sp) in the Elderly Patients
NCT02260427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Laryngeal Mask Airway in Edentulous Geriatric Patients
NCT02197377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Acceptability of I-GEL® in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Clinical Performance With Classic-LMA™
NCT01320163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres
NCT02852135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices Used for Patients Under General Anesthesia
NCT01001078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie
NCT02566135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree With Fiberoptic Bronchoskop Via the I-gel and LMA Protector
NCT03501602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree Via the I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme
NCT02476565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT02923427 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Head and Neck Position About Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Sealing Between the Laryngeal Mask and Vocal Cord Using Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Device
NCT01960673 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01007370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LMA I-Gel Versus LMA Protector During Minor Urological Procedures Under General Anesthesia in Adult Patients
NCT06825910 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of LMA-Supreme and I-gel for the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT02745964 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel and the Self-pressurized Air-q in Elderly Patients
NCT04365192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Device, Self-pressurized Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA -SP) in Adult Patients: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Airway (c-LMA)
NCT02206438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme and I-gel in Children
NCT01633073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of I-gel to the Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT00706823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison in Difficult Airway Scenario Induced in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic™, LMA™ - Flexible and LMA - Proseal™
NCT02979171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact on Postoperative Pain of Three Single-use Adult Supraglottic Airway Devices in Short General Anesthetic Under Controlled Ventilation
NCT03614598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of the Video Laryngeal Mask (SaCoVLM™) in Geriatric Patients: A Comparison With a Conventional Supraglottic Airway Device (Ambu®Auragain™)
NCT06237504 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Elderly Patients: Comparison With Young Adults
NCT01836419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Type of Laryngeal Mask : I-Gel & LMA ProSeal
NCT00624403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA