COMPARISON OF SECTIONAL MATRIX VERSUES CIRCUMFERENTIAL MATRIX FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL CONTACT IN CLASS 2 RESTORATIONS
NCT05734027 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2023-02-17
Summary
Class II caries affects proximal surfaces of premolars and maintain their anatomical proximal contact of tooth, is important to avoid food impaction in the interdental area for protection of periodontium and occurrence of secondary carious lesion.Different types of Matrix band system are used to restore tooth cavities with missing proximal walls, including flat or pre-contoured bands, retainer-fixed circumferential systems, and sectional matrices, and either metal or plastic matrices which produces good contours and contacts for use with amalgam and can also be employed for insertion of composite resin.This study aimed at assessing the influence of different matricing techniques :either sectional matrix or circumferential matrix and the influence of operator experience on reproduction of optimum proximal contacts for posterior proximal resin composite restorations.
Conditions
- Tooth Decay
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Sectional matrix
The sectional matrix is the best way to achieve a strong contact point in Class II restorations with composite resin in the posterior dental sector. The pre-wedging is essential to get a separation between teeth which avoid the matrix deformation during its insertion
- DEVICE
-
Circumferential matrix
Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) ,the band encircle the tooth and secured by retainer on the buccal and lingual aspect
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-27
- Primary Completion
- 2023-03-02
- Completion
- 2023-03-10
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Retention of Self-etch Sealants and Flowable Composite in Permanent Molars
NCT06895096 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
In Vivo Comparative Study of Two Different Rubber Dam System in Dental Practices
NCT05554757 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
NCT06092567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two GIC's in the Restoration of Posterior Class II Lesions in the Primary Dentition
NCT05965297 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Proximal Contact Quality in Posterior Complex Carious Cavities Restored With Bulk Fill Ormocer and Resin Composite Using a Precontoured Circumferential Matrix System Versus Pre Contoured Sectional Matrix System
NCT05625243 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Class II Restoration Using Bioactive Restorative Material vs Polyacid Modified Composite Resin in Primary Molars
NCT04030117 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endocrown Restorations Longevity Compared With Post Retained Restorations
NCT03476304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Class II Restorations
NCT06346756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Composite Resins in Class I Cavities
NCT06192667 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer
NCT06601972 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment in First Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT02717286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pulpal Complications in Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Without Glass-ionomer Cement Lining
NCT01567514 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results
NCT04678141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA