MedTrace Logo

Endotracheal Intubation Devices

NCT02277652 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2014-11-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the four different intubation devices in 6 different scenarios.

Conditions

  • Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

The Miller Laryngoscope

Direct laryngoscopy

DEVICE

The Bonfils intubation fibrescope

Optical laryngoscopy

DEVICE

The GlideScope Ranger

Videolaryngoscopy

DEVICE

The Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (SALT)

Blind intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Lukasz Szarpak · National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

  • Andrzej Kurowski · National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-10-31
Primary Completion
2014-11-30
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02277652 on ClinicalTrials.gov