Study Comparing Transobturator Cystocele vs. Anterior Vaginal RepairS
NCT05602246 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 592
Last updated 2026-03-19
Summary
Surgical correction of the prolapse in the anterior compartment remains one of the major challenges in urogynecology. Paravaginal defect in level II of vaginal fixation results in the majority of cystoceles. Clinically, these defects are often combined and/or may be bilateral. Hence, careful assessment and individualized planning of the surgical procedure is essential to optimize cystocele repair outcome. Several surgical techniques and approaches have been used for cystocele repair. After the ban on transvaginal meshes, the interest in native tissue repair has risen. Paravaginal defect repair is an effective surgery for paravaginal defect reconstruction. There is a current trend to utilize transvaginal surgery instead of more invasive transabdominal surgery. A novel method of transvaginal paravaginal defect repair - TOCR (transobturator cystocele repair) was suggested. The principle objective of the present trial is to compare its efficacy and safety to preexisting method of native tissue cystocele repair.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Cystocele
- Cystocele and Incomplete Uterovaginal Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Transobturator cystocele repair
Novel transvaginal surgical reconstruction of anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse.
- PROCEDURE
-
Anterior colporrhaphy
The traditional transvaginal surgery for cystocele treatment used as a comparator in the study
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Charles University, Czech Republic
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Vladimir Kalis, prof. MD PhD · Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University
-
Khaled MK Ismail, MBBCh, MSc, MD, PhD, FRCOG · Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University
-
Zdenek Rusavy, assoc. prof. MD PhD · Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2029-11-01
- Completion
- 2034-11-01
Countries
- Czechia
- Slovakia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Concomitant Posterior Colporrhaphy on Bowel Functions in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT06128291 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transobturator Lateral Suspension in Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT07144397 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
NCT02919852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Trans-vaginal Repair for Anterior Rectocele.
NCT06633172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
NCT05586984 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Prospective Study
NCT02765893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 1 Versus 2 Days Post-Operative Catheterization After Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT06429228 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Urinary Procedures Performed by Gynecologists, Results and Learning Curves.
NCT05150262 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06004089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspensions for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT04172896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT00581334 ·Status: COMPLETED