Surgical Outcomes and Costs in Using the Shenzhen HugeMed 6.3 French Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT07296835 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75
Last updated 2026-05-06
Summary
Comprehensive comparative investigations between HugeMed HU30M 6.3 Fr f-URS and traditional approach f-URS devices in RIRS are lacking in an American population. The investigators aim to compare the outcomes of using the 6.3 Fr f-URS versus traditional approach (other f-URS present in our institution) to treat patients with stone burden ≤ 2.5 cm. The findings of this study will expand on the potential advantages and drawbacks of HU30M in enhancing surgical outcomes and patient safety in RIRS procedures. We hypothesize that the use of the HU30M will result in increased cost savings while providing similar stone free rates when compared to traditionally used f-URS devices.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Ureteroscopy using the 6.3 Fr f-URS hugemed
All patients will be counseled on standard treatment options. Treatment options and subsequent care will not deviate from routine care. If they do not enroll in the study, the HU30M may still be used during routine surgery and care. The only intervention specific to the research will involve the use of patient information in describing the results. Participants will undergo RIRS in standard fashion, without deviation from the standard of care. Patients will be brought to the operating room, positioned, and placed under general anesthesia. RIRS will be performed using HU30M 6.3 Fr f-URS. Laser platform (ex: HoYAG or TFL) as well as laser settings will be at the treating investigator's discretion and may be changed during the procedure at their discretion as well, all per standard of care. The initial laser settings and changes that occurred to the settings after the first minute of the case will be recorded.
- DEVICE
-
Hugemed 6.3 Fr f-URS
Retrograde intrarenal surgery will be performed using HU30M 6.3 Fr f-URS.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
HugeMed
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University of Kansas Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Wilson R. Molina, MD · University of Kansas Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-11-30
- Completion
- 2028-11-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
An Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Control Ureteral Soft Scope System for Treating Stones With Infection.
NCT06841523 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure
NCT02734914 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Standard Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones
NCT06660914 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children
NCT06628765 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
NCT03220516 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy
NCT03349099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial
NCT06898216 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy (Including Flexible Ureteroscopy) Without Indwelling Urinary Catheter
NCT06458101 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA