Hard and Soft Tissue Maintenance Around Implants With a Sloped Configuration
NCT04712565 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-01-28
Summary
This study is a controlled, randomized clinical trial over about 16-months (active phase). 40 patients in need of replacement of a single tooth with a minimal crestal bone width of 4 - 5mm and suitable for simultaneous GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration) procedure as well as at least a neighboring tooth on its mesial aspect will be consecutively recruited at the Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Graz. Volunteers will be screened and eligible subjects will be randomized to two different groups. In group 1 implants with regular neck design (Astra Tech Implant EV C, Dentsply Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Hanau, Germany) and GBR procedure (BioOss® and BioGide®, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Schweiz) fixed with two membrane pins (Hipp Medical AG, Kolbingen, Germany) will be used; in group 2 implants with sloped marginal configuration (Astra Tech Implant Profile EV C, Dentsply Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Hanau, Germany) without bone augmentation are used. The dimension of the bony defect and amount of lingual-buccal bone height discrepancy (max. 5mm) respectively bone width will be evaluated using a 3-D volume tomography (Planmeca ProMax® 3D Max, Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), which is needed for digital planning (Simplant Planning Software, Leuven, Belgium) of the implant position, length and diameter as well.
Conditions
- Tooth Loss
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Astra Tech Implant System Profile EV
dental implant with a sloped neck configuration
- DEVICE
-
Astra Tech Implant System EV
dental implant with a conventional neck configuration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Graz
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-01-14
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-11
- Completion
- 2025-09-11
Countries
- Austria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Short Implants - An Alternative to Bone Grafting?
NCT01030523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ultra-narrow Diameter Implants (2,75 mm) Without Bone Regeneration Versus Standard Diameter Implants (4,3 mm) in Combination With Bone Regeneration
NCT03225495 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GBR and Autogenous Bone Chips
NCT03946020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Fixed vs Non-Fixed Resorbable Collagen Membranes
NCT06334159 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reinforced PTFE Meshes Versus Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04257097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT GBR One Stages Comparing A-Oss and Autogenous Bone Versus A-Oss and LCR-A
NCT06286605 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Bovine-derived Xenograft in Combination With or Without Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin
NCT04709523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Straumann BoneCeramic vs. Allograft Bone in Extraction Sockets
NCT00782236 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study to Evaluate an Implant With a Sloped Top in Patients With a Sloped Jaw Bone
NCT00807456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Contour Augmentation by Means of Connective Tissue Grafting Versus Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05143242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reliability of All on 4 Using 2 Zygomatic and 2 Conventional Implants vs All on 4 Implants for Rehabilitation of Maxilla
NCT05108324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Microarchitecture of the Augmented Bone Following Sinus Elevation
NCT04136509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Management Following Teeth Extraction
NCT03089619 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Zone Using Two Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques: Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane vs. Contour Augmentation.
NCT06987149 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 1-year Clinical Investigation on the the CREOS™ XENOGAIN Bone Graft SUBSTITUTE
NCT03028922 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GBR Versus Allogenic Bone Block
NCT07295041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Evaluation of a Novel Biomimetic Synthetic Bone Substitute (Creos® Syntogain)
NCT06473545 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Investigation to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of the Crestal, Minimal-invasive Sinus Floor Augmentation With the Pressure Chamber Drill (DKK) and the Sinus Vibration Pump (SVP)
NCT01204424 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
NCT07011303 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area
NCT04367766 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extra Short Implants Brånemark System® RP Ø4.5x4.5 mm Implants
NCT02178891 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of the Marginal Bone Around Subcrestal Implants
NCT05494476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation With Moldable Beta-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute on Non-containable Non-Molar Extraction Sites
NCT03215667 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA