MedTrace Logo

Reliability of All on 4 Using 2 Zygomatic and 2 Conventional Implants vs All on 4 Implants for Rehabilitation of Maxilla

NCT05108324 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2021-11-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Oral rehabilitation by dental implants in the severely atrophic maxilla often represents a challenge. To overcome this difficulty, bone augmentation procedures such as sinus augmentation, guided bone regeneration (GBR), or distraction osteogenesis have been used to obtain adequate bone height and width for proper three-dimensional implant placement. To avoid surgical morbidity and shorten treatment length, alternative methods such as short or tilted implants, as well as zygomatic implants (ZIs),have been proposed and have shown promising outcomes.

Conditions

  • Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

zygomatic implant

2 zygomatic implants and 2 anterior conventional implant

PROCEDURE

conventional implant

patients will receive 4 conventional dental implant

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed a. Atef, professor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-11-10
Primary Completion
2022-10-31
Completion
2023-02-14

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05108324 on ClinicalTrials.gov