MedTrace Logo

Radiographic and the Esthetic Outcome of Two Different Bone Grafting Techniques in Early Implant Placement

NCT03302143 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48

Last updated 2017-10-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Total of 48 subjects were randomly assigned to treatment groups:

UT Health Science Center at San Antonio Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan

Patients require a maxillary non-molar extraction site that is planned to be replaced by a dental implant and crown. This includes Straumann BL SLActive: Narrow (3.3mm) \& Regular (4.1mm) Crossfit implants in all available lengths.

Patients were randomly selected to receive either FDBA (test) or Autogenous bone + DBBM (control/standard) for contour augmentation.

Conditions

  • Missing Tooth
  • Fractured Tooth

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Guided bone regeneration with Bovine Bone Mineral

Guided bone regeneration with Bovine Bone Mineral

PROCEDURE

Guided bone regeneration with freeze dried bone allograft

Guided bone regeneration with freeze dried bone allograft

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-07-30
Primary Completion
2016-05-15
Completion
2016-05-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03302143 on ClinicalTrials.gov