MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Ultra-narrow Diameter Implants (2,75 mm) Without Bone Regeneration Versus Standard Diameter Implants (4,3 mm) in Combination With Bone Regeneration

NCT03225495 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2018-01-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main target of the study is to compare ultra-narrow diameter implants (2.75 mm) without bone regeneration versus standard diameter implants (4.3 mm) in combination with bone regeneration. To do so, patients with missing upper central incisors, canines, first or second premolars with alveolar ridges of 6 - 8 mm of thickness will be restored with dental implants. Cone beam computed tomographic examination and clinical values will be registered before and after the surgical procedure at 6 and 12 months.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant
  • Narrow Implant
  • Implant Fracture
  • Guided Bone Regeneration

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Standard implant

Arm - Standard Implant: implant placement in combination with guided bone regeneration;

PROCEDURE

Ultra-narrow implant

Arm - Ultra-narrow implant: implant placement without guided bone regeneration

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Adin Implants

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Geistlich Pharma AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • University of Barcelona

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-07-01
Primary Completion
2018-07-01
Completion
2019-07-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03225495 on ClinicalTrials.gov