MedTrace Logo

GBR Versus Allogenic Bone Block

NCT07295041 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37

Last updated 2025-12-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed to compare two different methods used to augment bone in the posterior lower jaw prior to implant placement in patients with insufficient bone width. Eligible patients were included in the study and received a horizontal bone augmentation with one of two methods, which differed in the materials used for the bone augmentation. The group allocation was randomised. After 6 months of healing following parameters were assessed: histological evaluation, survival of the bone graft, the need for further bone augmentation at the time of implant placement, changes in soft tissue characteristics, radiologically and clinically assessed changes in bone width.

Conditions

  • Alveolar Bone Grafting
  • Implant Placement

Interventions

PROCEDURE

allogenic bone blocks

An allogenic bone blocks were used for the primary bone augmentation procedure.

PROCEDURE

allogenic cancellous bone granules

allogenic cancellous bone granules were used for the primary bone augmentation procedure.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Algirdas Puisys, DDS, PhD

    lead NETWORK

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-01
Primary Completion
2024-01-24
Completion
2025-01-01

Countries

  • Lithuania

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07295041 on ClinicalTrials.gov