Contour Augmentation by Means of Connective Tissue Grafting Versus Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05143242 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42
Last updated 2021-12-03
Summary
The most frequent aesthetic complication following single implant treatment seems to be a lack of buccal convexity. This 'alveolar process deficiency' is the result of buccal bone remodeling following tooth extraction.
A traditional approach to treat alveolar process deficiency is guided bone regeneration (GBR), however post-operative complications such as swelling, bleeding and pain are common and the aesthetic outcome may not be optimal.
An alternative to the traditional GBR approach could be soft tissue contour augmentation using a connective tissue graft (CTG) at the buccal aspect. Possible advantages over GBR include less morbidity at the implant site, a superior aesthetic outcome since there is no need for vertical releasing incisions and less costs since there are no biomaterials to be used.
The primary study objective is to compare the GBR and CTG group in terms of 2 and 3 dimensional tissue alterations, focusing on the amount of tissue gain and volume stability over time. The secondary study objectives are morbidity, overall radiographic, clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Conditions
- Guided Bone Regeneration
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Hard tissue augmentation at the buccal aspect of single implants.
One or two releasing incisions are made. The periosteum is released and multiple bone perforations are made in the buccal bone prior to the application of deproteinized bovine derived xenograft. A Creos® membrane (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) is used to cover the occlusal part of the alveolar crest and the xenograft particles. Finally, multiple single monofilament sutures are used for primary tension-free wound closure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Soft tissue augmentation at the buccal aspect of single implants.
A CTG is taken from the palate and transplanted to the buccal side between the alveolar bone and the buccal flap. The CTG is secured with single monofilament sutures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Ghent
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2020-03-31
- Completion
- 2021-04-30
More Related Trials
-
Guided Surgery for Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT05282862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GBR Versus Allogenic Bone Block
NCT07295041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Zone Using Two Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques: Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane vs. Contour Augmentation.
NCT06987149 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and the Esthetic Outcome of Two Different Bone Grafting Techniques in Early Implant Placement
NCT03302143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Completely Versus Partially Guided Zygomatic Implant
NCT06227351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Provisionalization Into Extraction Sockets With Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects Within the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03676244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Bovine-derived Xenograft in Combination With or Without Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin
NCT04709523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area
NCT04367766 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Bone Grafts on Facial Gingival Profile in Maxillary Anterior Single Tooth Replacement
NCT01547273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Edentulous Sites Augmented With Collagen Matrix or CTG
NCT04915677 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05781529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjunctive Use of Polynucleotide and Hyaluronic Acid-based Gel in Alveolar Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT06633211 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With or Without Autogenous Block Grafts
NCT03432702 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Particles Sizes and the Stability of Soft and Hard Tissue in Aesthetic Area
NCT06020040 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Esthetic With Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation With Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone
NCT03544580 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Concentrated Growth Factors in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT06308536 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Material's Histomorphometric Analysis In Socket Preservation
NCT06740110 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tenting Screws in Combination With Platelet Concentrate for Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
NCT04835532 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Bone Grafts in Patients Who Need One of Their Front Teeth Removed and Replaced With an Implant
NCT06722482 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Versus Allogeneic Bone Graft Around Dental Implant in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06773104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Ridge Augmentation Strategies
NCT06242782 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation of The Labial Bone Dimensional Changes After Immediate Implant
NCT05360693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA