Comparison of CoCr Alloy and TiN Coating in TKA
NCT04701359 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2023-03-16
Summary
In the current prospective, randomized study, two different materials of the same total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system - cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-nitride (TiN) - are going to be compared with regards to postoperative outcome. Two-hundred patients are planned to be included in the study over a 4-year period, randomly assigned to either the CoCr- or TiN-implant-group. In order to ensure double-blinding, patients will not be informed about the group they had been assigned to. Moreover, no identifying information of the implant used will be written on documents later accessible to nurses and/or physicians at follow-up appointments. Consequently, surgeons of the respective patients will be excluded from study-specific examination of patients. Despite range of motion (ROM), questionnaires (visual analogue scale - VAS; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC, Forgotten Joint Score - FJS; Knee Society Scoe - KSS) will be used to assess the postoperative outcome. Furthermore, metal ion levels (cobalt, chrom, molybdenum, titanium) in the blood stream of patients will be measured at scheduled follow-up appointments. It is expected that there will not be a measureable difference between the two coating-groups with regards to ROM, functionality, and metal-ion levels over time.
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
TiN-alloy based total knee arthroplasty
TiN-alloy based TKA implanted for knee osteoarthritis.
- DEVICE
-
CoCr-coating based total knee arthroplasty
CoCr-coating based TKA implanted for knee osteoarthritis.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Alphamed Medizintechnik Fischer GmbH
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Medical University of Graz
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-10
- Primary Completion
- 2024-11-01
- Completion
- 2029-11-01
Countries
- Austria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Robotic Assisted vs Custom Made Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06280352 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Importance of Different Modularity of the Polyethylene Insert for Tibial Component Migration and Adaptive Bone Remodeling After Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT) Zimmer NexGen®, (Monoblock vs. Modular Design)
NCT01637051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Tritanium Compared With Cemented Metal-backed Tibia Components in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02578446 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Mineral Density Changes Under Two Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01764984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of Total Knee Replacement Patients Using the Zimmer-Biomet Persona Total Knee System With Different Inserts
NCT04643119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TRabecular Metal Economic and Clinical Knee Trial
NCT04677907 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare the NexGen CR and CR-Flex Knee Implants
NCT00761956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-market Follow up Study of the 'BPK-S Integration' UC as Primary Implant in the Variants CoCr or Ceramic
NCT03293719 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study
NCT01041937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ROCC Knee Data Collection
NCT00758901 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Kinamed Gem Ceramic Femoral Component for Total Knee Replacement
NCT00743717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement in Improving Rehabilitation and Function
NCT00710840 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Trabecular Metal Mesh Tibial Monoblock RSA
NCT00405379 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Prospective and Retrospective Post-Market Follow Up of the 'BPK-S Integration' UC as Primary Implant in the Variant CoCr
NCT03406637 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
In Vivo Comparison of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With Either a ConforMIS or Traditional Knee Implant
NCT01882751 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Nickel Sensitivity
NCT04058743 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the ANTHEM™ CR Total Knee System
NCT03885622 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR
NCT04040764 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Migration and Survival of All-polyethylene Tibial All Poly Components Compared to the Metal-backed Modular Components of the Triathlon CS Total Knee System. A Single Center RSA Study
NCT04358575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Migration of CS vs CR Insert in TKA Using RSA
NCT05936593 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cemented vs Cementless TKA
NCT03683992 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
In Vivo Kinematics Comparison of Stryker or Zimmer Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01864434 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Efficacy of Using CR and PS Prosthesis in Total Knee Replacement
NCT03877042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
In-vivo Wear Behaviour of AS Coated Versus Uncoated Columbus® Total Knee Prosthesis
NCT05509972 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Safety and Performance Using Legion™ CR Oxinium and CoCr Femoral Implants Combined With Legion™/Genesis™ II XLPE High Flex Tibial Inserts
NCT03687593 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING