MedTrace Logo

Robotic Assisted vs Custom Made Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT06280352 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2025-01-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Robotic Assisted, functionally aligned vs Custom Made Total Knee Arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Which implant/philosophy yields better clinical outcomes?
* Which implant/philosophy yields better satisfaction?
* Which system is more OR efficient? Participants will be followed for 2 years postoperatively.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Custom made Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee replacement, patient specific custom made total knee Origin (Symbios, Symbios Orthopédie SA, Avenue des Sciences 1, 1400 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland)

DEVICE

Functionally aligned robotically assisted total knee arthroplasty

Total knee replacement, Total Knee Implant Triathlon (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, U.S.) implanted using MAKO Rio Robotic Arm (Stryker), using functional alignment strategy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Austrian Workers Compensation Board Styria

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-03-01
Primary Completion
2027-04-30
Completion
2027-04-30
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06280352 on ClinicalTrials.gov