MedTrace Logo

In Vivo Kinematics Comparison of Stryker or Zimmer Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT01864434 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2019-10-10

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This study will compare the kinematics data collected from patients with implants created by different manufacturers to see which of these implants provides a more normal-like kinematic pattern compared to the normal knee.

Conditions

  • Knee Prosthesis

Interventions

DEVICE

Stryker posterior cruciat retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

The fluoroscopy procedure itself is used as a means of data collection and is not the intervention under investigation; therefore, the study is observational and not interventional.

DEVICE

Zimmer PCR TKA

The fluoroscopy procedure itself is used as a means of data collection and is not the intervention under investigation; therefore, the study is observational and not interventional.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Stryker Orthopaedics

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Adrija Sharma, Ph D · The University of Tennessee

  • Richard D Komistek, Ph D · The University of Tennessee

  • William R Hamel, Ph D · The University of Tennessee

  • Harold E Cates, MD · Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-06-30
Primary Completion
2014-11-30
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01864434 on ClinicalTrials.gov