The Importance of Different Modularity of the Polyethylene Insert for Tibial Component Migration and Adaptive Bone Remodeling After Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT) Zimmer NexGen®, (Monoblock vs. Modular Design)
NCT01637051 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2022-04-27
Summary
In a prospective randomised study two uncemented tibial components with different polyethylene modularities (Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT) Zimmer NexGen® monobloc and TMT Zimmer NexGen® modular) used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is evaluated. Both tibial component coatings are designed to provide excellent condition for bone ingrowth.
The differences between the two tibial components are evaluated by measurements of migration of the tibial component assessed by Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and measurements of the adaptive bone remodeling of the proximal tibial assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
Conditions
- Arthrosis of the Knee
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Zimmer NexGen® Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT), Monoblock
A prospective randomized study where the patients are randomized too receive a monoblock tibial component with trabecular metal coating (TMT Zimmer NexGen®) or a modular tibial component (TMT Zimmer NexGen®). Both prostheses are available and approved by the FDA and CE. The only difference between the implants is that of the polyethylene insert (monoblock vs. modular). The operations are performed at the Department of Planned Elective Surgery Z, Gentofte Hospital by two experienced TKA surgeons that will be included in the research group. During surgery a minimum of 4 Tantalum markers (0.8 mm) is inserted in the bone of the proximal tibia and 6 markers are inserted in the polyethylene insert.
- DEVICE
-
Zimmer NexGen® Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT), Modular
A prospective randomized study where the patients are randomized too receive a monoblock tibial component with trabecular metal coating (TMT Zimmer NexGen®) or a modular tibial component (TMT Zimmer NexGen®). Both prostheses are available and approved by the FDA and CE. The only difference between the implants is that of the polyethylene insert (monoblock vs. modular). The operations are performed at the Department of Planned Elective Surgery Z, Gentofte Hospital by two experienced TKA surgeons that will be included in the research group. During surgery a minimum of 4 Tantalum markers (0.8 mm) is inserted in the bone of the proximal tibia and 6 markers are inserted in the polyethylene insert.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Zimmer Biomet
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mikkel Rathsach Andersen, Ph.D · Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-05-31
- Completion
- 2026-08-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis on Migration of Knee Prostheses.
NCT00138853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) Trial Comparing Trabecular Metal Monoblock and Modular Tibial Components
NCT01180595 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
All-poly Versus Metal-backed
NCT04358601 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Changes Using Two Tibial Base Plate Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patient
NCT03970460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Mineral Density Changes Under Two Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01764984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties. A Trial Evaluating Early Component Migration by RSA and Patient Reported Outcome.
NCT01966848 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PMCF Study on the Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits Data of the NexGen TM Augmentation Patella
NCT05253976 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
A Comparison of the Persona Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using CR or MC Polyethylene
NCT03568123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of the LEGION Medial Stabilized (MS) Insert in Patients Undergoing a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT07199738 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study
NCT01041937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Total Knee Replacement Patients Using the Zimmer-Biomet Persona Total Knee System With Different Inserts
NCT04643119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00979147 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
RSA Study of Persona TKA With CR vs MC Polyethylene
NCT03494348 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TRabecular Metal Economic and Clinical Knee Trial
NCT04677907 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare the NexGen CR and CR-Flex Knee Implants
NCT00761956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
NexGen Gender Fixed Bearing Knee Versus NexGen Legacy Knee Posterior Stabilized (LPS) - Flex Fixed Bearing Knee: A Study Comparing Two Different Knee Prostheses
NCT00901329 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cemented vs. Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05616884 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Persona MC Retained PCL vs. Persona Posterior-stabilized vs. NexGen PS
NCT04164147 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multigen Plus H Study and AMF TT Cones
NCT04884542 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Kinamed Gem Ceramic Femoral Component for Total Knee Replacement
NCT00743717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Polyethylene Wear Particle Analysis of TKA
NCT06426641 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Migration and Survival of All-polyethylene Tibial All Poly Components Compared to the Metal-backed Modular Components of the Triathlon CS Total Knee System. A Single Center RSA Study
NCT04358575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of CoCr Alloy and TiN Coating in TKA
NCT04701359 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Migration of CS vs CR Insert in TKA Using RSA
NCT05936593 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT02430129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA