TRabecular Metal Economic and Clinical Knee Trial

NCT04677907 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 144

Last updated 2025-06-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the differences, if any, in clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and survivorship between cemented and uncemented Total Knee Replacements (TKR)? To investigate if there are health economic implications of using uncemented TKRs in the NHS?

Conditions

  • Total Knee Replacement
  • Orthopedics

Interventions

DEVICE

Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised uncemented Trabecular Metal™ (Tibia and Femur) prosthesis

Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised uncemented Trabecular Metal™ (Tibia and Femur) prosthesis vs a Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised cemented prosthesis

DEVICE

Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised cemented Trabecular Metal™ (Tibia and Femur) prosthesis

Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised uncemented Trabecular Metal™ (Tibia and Femur) prosthesis vs a Persona (Zimmer) posterior stabilised cemented prosthesis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zimmer Biomet

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • University of Strathclyde

    collaborator OTHER
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mark JG Blyth, Mr · NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-05-10
Primary Completion
2025-11-30
Completion
2035-06-30

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04677907 on ClinicalTrials.gov