Prediction of Inspiratory Effort Response to High PEEP in Patients Recovering From ARDS

NCT04524091 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-04-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Spontaneous breathing during the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation in ARDS may be harmful, as high respiratory drive can generate large transpulmonary pressure swings and worsen lung injury. Higher PEEP may mitigate this by reducing inspiratory effort and lung stress, but patient response is variable and difficult to predict. While improved lung compliance appears to mediate the protective effects of PEEP, its bedside assessment is complex. Preclinical data suggest that changes in compliance are inversely reflected by changes in respiratory rate, but this relationship and its clinical utility in ARDS patients remain unclear.

Conditions

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

OTHER

Positive end expiratory pressure

Initially, the patients will be ventilated using pressure support ventilation with an inspiratory pressure adjusted to achieve 6 - 8 ml/kg of PBW with a minimal esophageal pressure swing of 5 cmH2O and a PEEP of 5 cmH2O. After 5 minutes, we will collect basic and advanced respiratory monitoring, including esophageal pressure and transpulmonary pressure swings. The same procedure will be carried out with 10 and 15 cmH2O of PEEP. Inspiratory pressure will be kept constant throughout the protocol.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sanatorio Anchorena San Martin

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-08-01
Primary Completion
2026-04-01
Completion
2026-08-01

Countries

  • Argentina

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04524091 on ClinicalTrials.gov