Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

NCT04725084 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 355

Last updated 2023-02-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the main clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) infected patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

During the first phase of the outbreak (between February and May 2020), the use of invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV) was largely required with 63% of ICU patients intubated in the first 24 hours after admission and up to 80% of patients during the overall ICU stay. Mortality was especially higher when using MV in the first 24 hours. In contrast, the use of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in the first 24 hours was only 19% for High Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and 6% for Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV).

Several non-invasive oxygenation strategies were proposed in order to delay or avoid MV in ICU patients suffering from Covid-19 ARDS. The use of HFNC became the recommended oxygenation strategy, based in particular on publications prior to the outbreak. The use of NIV or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) combined with HFNC have also been proposed. Although these non-invasive oxygenation strategies seem widely used in the second phase of the outbreak, they have not yet confirmed their clinical impact on MV requirement and patient's outcome. Moreover, no comparison has been made between these different non-invasive oxygenation strategies.

The aim of this study is to compare different non-invasive oxygenation strategies (HFNC, NIV, CPAP) on MV requirement and outcome in ICU patients treated for ARDS related to Covid-19.

Conditions

  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Interventions

OTHER

Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula alone

Use of high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy alone

OTHER

Use of Non-invasive Ventilation

Use of non-invasive ventilation combined or not with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy

OTHER

Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Use of continuous positive airway pressure combined or not with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jonathan Chelly, MD · Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-07-01
Primary Completion
2020-12-15
Completion
2020-12-15

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04725084 on ClinicalTrials.gov