Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs
NCT04481087 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2025-09-29
Summary
The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the performances of a universal adhesive in three different application modes, a self-etch adhesive and an etch\&rinse adhesive in restoration of non-caries cervical lesions. Thirty-four patients will receive restorations. Lesions will be divided into 5 groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: CU-SE: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in self-etch mode, CU-SLE: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in selective etch mode, CU-ER: Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in etch\&rinse mode, CSE: Clearfil SE Bond, TB: Tetric N-Bond. Restorations (Tetric N-Ceram composite) will be scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post operative sensitivity using modified USPHS criteria after 48 months. Two examiners who is not involved in the placement of restorations will conduct the evaluations. Descriptive statistics will be performed using Chi-square tests.
Conditions
- Tooth Wear
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Clearfil Universal Bond Quick
Adhesive systems
- DEVICE
-
Clearfil Universal Bond Quick
Adhesive systems
- DEVICE
-
Clearfil Universal Bond Quick
Adhesive systems
- DEVICE
-
Clearfil SE Bond
Adhesive systems
- DEVICE
-
Tetric N-Bond
Adhesive systems
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-10
- Primary Completion
- 2018-05-10
- Completion
- 2026-06-10
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
NCCL Direct Composite Restoration Performance With Self-Etch and Multimode Adhesives
NCT02698371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
NCT04324008 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Restorations Using Different Modes of Universal Adhesive
NCT06227715 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Different Modes of Universal Adhesive
NCT04271150 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Enamel Etching in Self-etching Adhesives: a 2-year Clinical Trial
NCT02419157 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Different Adhesive Strategies With a Universal System in Sclerosed Dentin in NCCL: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT05211908 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation Of Class I Composite Resin Restorations Using Three Different Adhesive Systems
NCT04589416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Resin-hybrid Ceramic Restorations Produced Using a Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System With Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations
NCT06496126 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Different Composite Materials in Class III and IV Restorations.
NCT07343063 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites
NCT06375837 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Non-carious Cervical Lesions at 2 Years
NCT04565938 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
NCT04685967 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial of the Effect of Different Categories of Adhesive System
NCT02751970 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Fissure Sealants Bonded With Different Universal Adhesives
NCT02897089 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Reduced Dentin Etching Time Using Universal Adhesives in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
NCT06465849 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Wet and Overwet Dentin on the Clinical Performance of Two Universal Adhesive Systems
NCT07034235 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Surface Sealant Application on Clinical Performance Occlusal Restorations
NCT03184025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CLINICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GLASS IONOMER-BASED RESTORATIVES AND A BULK-FILL RESIN COMPOSITE IN CLASS I CAVITIES: A 48-MONTH RANDOMIZED SPLIT-MOUTH CONTROLLED TRIAL
NCT05559333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
BONDING TO ENAMEL USING A UNIVERSAL ADHESIVE
NCT03254693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Caries Sealing Using Giomer and Glass Ionomer Cement With or Without Silver Diamine Fluoride
NCT03872986 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment Methods on Quality of Life
NCT04887181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Composite Restorations
NCT04488380 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA