MedTrace Logo

Clinical Comparison of Universal Adhesives in Terms of Different Application Modes on the Restoration of NCCLs

NCT03415516 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2021-09-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives and an etch\&rinse adhesive in restoration of non-caries cervical lesions. Twenty patients will receive restorations. Lesions will be divided into 7 groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: GSE: Gluma Universal- self etch, GSL: Gluma Universal-selective etching, GER: Gluma Universal-etch\&rinse, ASE: All Bond Universal- self etch, ASL: All Bond Universal- selective etching, AER: All Bond Universal- etch\&rinse, SB (Control): Single Bond2+etch\&rinse. Restorations (nano-hybrid composite) will be scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post operative sensitivity using modified USPHS criteria after 48 months. Two examiners who is not involved in the placement of restorations will conduct the evaluations. Descriptive statistics will be performed using Chi-square tests.

Conditions

  • Tooth Wear

Interventions

DEVICE

Gluma Universal

Adhesive systems

DEVICE

All Bond Universal

Adhesive systems

DRUG

Single Bond2

Adhesive systems

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-07-01
Primary Completion
2015-11-01
Completion
2018-11-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03415516 on ClinicalTrials.gov