Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of the Scanning Pattern on Complete-arch Implant Scans
NCT05985226 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1
Last updated 2023-08-14
Summary
This clinical trial aims to analyze and compare the influence of different scanning strategies (zigzag with conventional scan body, circumferential with conventional scan body, surface blocking with conventional scan body, zigzag with low profile scan body, standard strategy with low profile scan body) on the accuracy of the records obtained for a case of fixed rehabilitation on full-arch dental implants in patients of both sexes, over 18 years of age who will be rehabilitated with fixed prostheses on full-arch implants.
The main question it aims to answer is if there will be significant differences in scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) between the different groups of digital impressions compared to the reference model (conventional impression with rigid splinting) and types of scan bodies.
The patient will undergo conventional impression-taking (with pastes) to obtain the reference model. Subsequently, digital records will be taken with the intra-oral scanner until completing 15 records per group, out of a total of 6 experimental groups (1.- zigzag with conventional scan body (ZZ-SBL), 2.- circumferential with conventional scan body (C-SBL), 3.- surface blocking with scan conventional body (B-SBL), 4.- zigzag with low profile scan body (ZZ-SBL), 5.- a standard strategy with low profile scan body (STD-SBL), 6.- single pass with low profile scan body ( OP-SBL) These experimental groups will be scanned directly in the patient's mouth, to later be compared with the reference model, called the "master model".
Researchers will compare the six different methodologies for taking digital impressions to demonstrate which strategies are more accurate, faster, and require fewer frames.
Conditions
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
intraoral scan
All the experimental groups will be developed with an intraoral scanner, a device that emits light and collects the image projected by that light, to build a 3-dimensional digital model. It is more comfortable than conventional impressions and it is a harmless, non-intrusive, and painless procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Miguel Gómez-Polo, PhD, DDS · Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-08-31
- Completion
- 2023-09-30
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Movement of Dental Implants During Osseointegration
NCT07297147 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Aesthetic Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant-supported Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla With Either White Zirconia or Fluorescent White Zirconia Abutments
NCT05475249 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Computer-assisted Template-based Implant Placement Using Conventional or Digital Impression
NCT03764176 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry
NCT05972148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbiome Development in the Early Healing of Osseointegrated Implants
NCT05941663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Implant Surface Characteristics in Patients With History of Periodontitis
NCT05010382 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.
NCT06570499 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Different Screwed Abutment Height
NCT06017115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Scanning Accuracy in the Edentulous Mandible
NCT05032170 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of B+ Surface on Early Loading
NCT03059108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant Using Metal Ceramic Restorations With Either Zirconia or Titanium Abutments
NCT02315794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation Clinical and Radiographic Images in Dental Implants Rehabilitated With Overdentures
NCT02511977 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Full-Arch Rehabilitation
NCT01905306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Implant Surface Material and Topography on Bone Regeneration.
NCT05890469 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques
NCT06669065 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Technique to Analyze the Wear of Implants and Natural Tooth as Antagonist.
NCT05842655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Double Versus Triple Scan Protocol in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT03321162 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparative Study of Immediate Single Unit Implants in Early Loading Protocols, With or Without Photobiomodulation.
NCT05106855 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Neutral-Zone CAD/CAM Dentures Restoring Mandibular Resorbed Ridges
NCT05895292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Worn Dentition With Innovative CAD-CAM Composites
NCT02828696 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Simplified vs Conventional Drilling Protocol for Implant Placment
NCT06780956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws Using Short Implants With Different Surface Characteristics
NCT05766878 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06590753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA