The Accuracy of the Performance and Placement Test for Predicting Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) Position in the Hypopharynx as Confirmed With Video Laryngoscopy
NCT03643029 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2018-08-23
Summary
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube.
Five tests have been recommend to ensure that the SAD can be used for advanced procedure after a blind insertion. These tests however are not confirmed with visual validation and hence the confirmation of optimal position can be misleading.
This study is conducted to validate by video laryngoscopy the five recommended tests for confirming the placement and efficacy of a SAD, thus enabling its safe application in institutions with limited availability of video laryngoscopes.
Subjects for this study will consist of patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Conditions
- General Anesthesia
- Supraglottic Airway Device
- Laryngeal Mask Airway
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion
Following insertion of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), the placement and performance tests are carried out. If the tests are successful, a video-laryngoscopy will be performed to confirm the placement of the SAD in the hypopharynx.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Malaya
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-31
- Completion
- 2020-06-30
More Related Trials
-
Hyperangulated Versus Standard Geometry Laryngoscope Blade Trial
NCT07223762 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Adult
NCT03544749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bed up Head Elevated Intubation Position With Glidescope Assisted Tracheal Intubation
NCT03357679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
NCT01632683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
NCT03118596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Two Supraglottic Airway Devices (Ambu AuraGain vs Air Q-3) in Terms of Performance Characteristics.
NCT06914453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The New Third Generation Video Laryngeal Mask Evaluation
NCT07007403 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Ultrasonographic Skin-to-Epiglottis Distance With Modified Mallampati Versus Modified Mallampati Score Alone in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy During Tracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia
NCT07315256 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of a New Supraglottic Airway With Built-in Cuff Pressure Indicator
NCT01800344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01007370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Inflation Methods of Ambú Auragain™ and Its Adverse Effects
NCT04795544 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices in EBUS
NCT06177769 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Laryngoscopes: Single-use Device Laryngobloc ® (SU) Versus Reusable Handle With Disposable Metal Blade (R)
NCT01632085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Videolaryngoscopes on Intubation Success in Difficult Airway Patients
NCT03407898 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airway Management
NCT03571295 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation Using Conventional Laryngoscope Versus C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery
NCT04433884 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Neck Extension on Blind Intubation Via Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03408431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LMA Protector Cuff Pilot vs LMA Supreme Among Anaesthetised, Non-Paralysed Patients
NCT03984032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Intubation Via Video Laryngeal Mask Airways (VLMAs) Versus Video Laryngoscopy
NCT06396234 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bronchoscopic Endotracheal Intubation Through a SAD - Physician Performance
NCT04743440 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Comparison of the Success Rate of the Endotracheal Intubation Between the Stylet and the Frova With Acute Angled Videolaryngoscope
NCT03962374 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
NCT03265938 ·Status: COMPLETED